Classical Music Forum banner

Something I've noticed. Am I alone in noticing this?

2K views 14 replies 9 participants last post by  An Die Freude 
#1 ·
I love browsing cds, even if I am never going to buy any of the ones I'm looking at, and one thing I've noticed, that No one ever packages Beethovens Symphonies in a different order, always 1,3, 2,4 6,8, etc. I was wondering, what's wrong with 1,2,3,4 or, going completely crazy in symphony order? Is it length of cd that prevents it or just practicality? This seems to be across the board when dealing with any large cycle of something.
 
#4 ·
Length is an issue, definitely.

But with things like Bach's cello suites, I've noticed sometimes on these 2 disc sets with all the 6 suites, they either do them in sequential order or mix things around.

I think this has to do with what the makers of the disc & of course the musician/s decide is best to showcase that particular recording/performance. There are probably reasons we don't know why they choose to sometimes mix up the order, in other words. Eg. what is good as an opener on the set, what works in the middle, and what is good to finish off. That kind of thing, a bit like a concert program, etc...
 
#5 ·
Some have managed it - Weingartner plus Zinman and Chailly, as I recall. I'm assuming the duration of the 'Eroica' is at the root of it - if a performance is teetering on the 50 minute mark then it virtually rules out the possibility of the 4th (which often takes over 30 minutes) being its twin on the same disc. Come to think of it, I think there was also a disc of von Karajan's accounts of 3 and 4 that were just about shoehorned onto one disc but I can't recall which cycle it was from. I have his 60s cycle in a box set and 3 and 4 were paired with 1 and 2 respectively on that occasion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vaneyes
#9 ·
Thanks for the confirmation, Vaneyes - I remember that Mehta's Mahler 2 on Decca is of similar threshold-breaking length so it shows it can be done.
 
#13 ·
Not exactly on-topic, but related- sometimes a strict numerical sequencing beggars common-sense. An example of this is the [really, otherwise excellent] Rachmaninoff Three Symphonies set by Ormandy-Philadelphia (originally on Columbia). The play order is: disc one, Symphony 1 and half of Symphony 2... disc two, the other half of Symphony 2 and Symphony 3. Couldn't they just have placed Symphony 2 on one disc, and pair 1 & 3 to one another?! NOoooo... :rolleyes:
 
#14 · (Edited)
The box set of Beethoven symphonies I have is ordered like this: CD1: symphonies one and two; CD2: symphonies three and four; CD3: symphonies five and six; CD4: symphonies seven and eight; CD5 symphony nine.



Each CD is under 80 minutes in length.

I also have one of HvK's cycles on LP, but I got it for two bucks at a second hand shop and it's missing no. 8. Oh well it's not that much of a loss really.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top