View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Dec-28-2008, 15:09
Kuhlau's Avatar
Kuhlau Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 293
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yagan Kiely View Post
So you think that Mozart and Beethoven were born with the ability to compose music? It was an inane gift, there is a part of their brain that is specifically geared towards the abstract art of music, a form of art that has no reference to human evolution?
What I'm questioning, Yagan, is not whether or not there's any scientific evidence to support or dismiss the idea of 'genius', but your own absolute assertion that a person cannot be born with innate potentiality for exceptional ability in any given area of life.

Why should 'natural' equate 'born with'? Cannot some natural ability be latent; encouraged to flower to a quite extraordinary extent later in a person's life with the aid of top-flight education, personal enthusiasm/ambition and other 'ideal' circumstances? Would it not then be appropriate to call such a flowering 'genius', especially if that flowering results in demonstrable achievements that tower over those of others who've benefited from similarly excellent situations?

If I mean anything by the term 'genius', sir, I most certainly mean this.

FK
__________________
An everyman for himself ~ Classical music reviews & resources
--
Follow me on Twitter
Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.04172 seconds with 10 queries