 |

Nov-28-2009, 00:33
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 77
|
|
Favorite recording of the Beethoven sonatas?
I would post this on the keyboard forum... but it's slow as hell. So..
After having listened to many, many different notable pianists tackle the sonatas, including Alfred Brendel, Idil Biret, Richard Goode, and others, I have come to the conclusion that the ultimate interpreter of Beethoven's sonatas, to this day, is John O'Conor. Why?
1. His technique is so impeccable that he makes everything, even the most difficult passages, sound incredibly easy. He'll never make you nervous-he has complete control over every section.
2. The melodic line is ALWAYS incredibly clear and sweet. It's really beautiful how he always manages to make every line sound so perfect..
3. His playing style is always appropriate to the individual piece. The anguished and energetic sonatas (Appassionata, Pathetique, Waldstein, Op. 111, etc) are intensely dramatic, and generally at fast tempos. The others are appropriately lyrical and relaxed ("Hunt", Pastoral, Op. 110, etc).
4. It rarely gets thunderously loud. There's a tendency by many pianists to bang on the piano as hard as they can whenever there's a forte or fortissimo.. context counts, people. Plus, these sonatas were written for the fortepiano, a quieter instrument than the modern piano. O'Conor understands this and maintains an element of restraint throughout the piece, so that when the music really does require fff playing, the effect is extremely dramatic in contrast.
So, if you haven't heard this guy (and most people I know haven't), definitely give him a try. I particularly recommend his performances of the "Appassionata" and the "Waldstein" to start with.
|

Nov-28-2009, 02:51
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 336
|
|
I choose Gulda for the earlies, Horowitz for the middles, and Solomon for the lasts.
|

Nov-28-2009, 04:02
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 892
|
|
Solomon and Sofronitsky all the way. Sofronitsky for the one's we do have of him (I'm not sure why, but he always pans out to be my favorite interpreter of every piece he plays). And Solomon for the rest.
|

Nov-29-2009, 08:35
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 70
|
|
Paul Badura-Skoda. His original cycle (Astree label, long out of print) is the most consistent to these ears.
|

Nov-29-2009, 11:29
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: TN
Posts: 367
|
|
Vladmir Ashkenazy - The Piano Sonatas
Maria Pires and Augustin Dumay - The Violin Sonatas
Recommend and love both sets. Augustin Dumay is one of the finest violinists of all time, without being to showy.
|

Nov-29-2009, 12:30
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,183
|
|
I love Emil Gilels' recordings of the piano sonatas.
|

Nov-29-2009, 14:34
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 422
|
|
Annie Fischer and Jeno Jando.
|

Nov-29-2009, 19:36
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 698
|
|
I love Brendel, Kempff, and Gulda. I would also second the Gilels recommendation.
|

Nov-29-2009, 22:32
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 550
|
|
I have several sets but rarely listen to any of them all the way through, as quite a few of individual sonatas don't interest me as much as they once used to. Among the more famous sonatas (all of which I do still like) I would be hard-pressed to pick out one "best" set. I reckon that the best versions are: Pathetique: Gilels
Moonlight: Pletnev
Pastoral: Goode
Tempest: Gulda
Die Jaqd: Schnabel
Waldstein: Gilels
Appasionata: Barenboim
Fur Therese: Pollini
Les Adieux: Pollini
Hammerklavia: Solomon
No 30: Ashkenazy
No 31: Gulda
No 32: Pollini
I don't care for forte piano versions of these sonatas. Also, on the whole I don't care much for Brendel who I find is too plain-ordinary and contains no fire in any of it. Schnabel is extremely good (probably the best pianist overall) but the sound quality is not top notch.
|

Dec-01-2009, 04:48
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 499
|
|
I own the complete sonatas by Barenboim on EMI, Brendel on Decca (digital recording) and have a disc of the "favourite" sonatas by Kempff - currently Brendel is my favourite: I like his approach and the sound on this recording  .
|

Dec-04-2009, 21:12
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver,Washington USA
Posts: 887
|
|
While no set is completely GREAT through and through, I do consider the Phillips set of Brendel as stunning. I listen to it more than my others. Solomon is great as an older set though. Gilels does well.
Jim
|

Dec-05-2009, 03:04
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 520
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I have several sets but rarely listen to any of them all the way through, as quite a few of individual sonatas don't interest me as much as they once used to. Among the more famous sonatas (all of which I do still like) I would be hard-pressed to pick out one "best" set. I reckon that the best versions are: Pathetique: Gilels
Moonlight: Pletnev
Pastoral: Goode
Tempest: Gulda
Die Jaqd: Schnabel
Waldstein: Gilels
Appasionata: Barenboim
Fur Therese: Pollini
Les Adieux: Pollini
Hammerklavia: Solomon
No 30: Ashkenazy
No 31: Gulda
No 32: Pollini
I don't care for forte piano versions of these sonatas. Also, on the whole I don't care much for Brendel who I find is too plain-ordinary and contains no fire in any of it. Schnabel is extremely good (probably the best pianist overall) but the sound quality is not top notch.
|
Yeh Schnabel. People did say he was the voice of Beethoven.
|

Dec-05-2009, 03:36
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,041
|
|
I only have the Andras Schiff set complete - the ones with the bizarre ink smears on the covers. I have other sonata recordings that are piecemeal, but the Schiff set offers a new clarity to my ears, not overly dramatized or bombastic, but still a bit quirky. He throws in a startling repeat of what most performers think of as mere introductory material in the Pathetique. It sounds so correct, one can never go back to hearing it the usual way.
These mostly live recordings are a bit noisy however.
|

Dec-05-2009, 04:48
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,607
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handlebar
While no set is completely GREAT through and through, I do consider the Phillips set of Brendel as stunning. I listen to it more than my others. Solomon is great as an older set though. Gilels does well.
Jim
|
Interesting to read your comments as I have just D/L the Brendel set I still have to burn to CD but am very keen to hear them, I have Ashkenazy full set and many other individuals, I also try to avoid complete sets as only a few will be great the rest ordinary.
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|

Dec-05-2009, 15:55
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 108
|
|
It's a pity Pollini has never released a complete Beethoven, I have always felt that he's the greatest Beethoven interpreter of all, even for the piano concertos.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +2. The current date and time is Mar-22-2010 15:45.
|