Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: An Interesting Disscussion

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I thought it might make an interesting discussion to each tell about what aspects of composition we think different composers did best at. I 'll reply to my own thread when I have time. Anyway, which people you think did best at melody, tone color (and different aspects of tone color), dynamics, counterpoint, other aspects of harmony, chord progressions, overall structure, etc. etc. Every composer was very unique and had his own individual combinations of strengths and weaknesses.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Quaverion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I think Mozart and Bach were best at structure, since their pieces are usually based upon patterns. I think Paganini and Sarasate were both very good at dynamics, and I like Saint-Saens for his melody. Danse Macabre is one of my favourite songs.
    It is our imperfections that make us who we are.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    223
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    ...mine too!
    <span style='color:green'><span style='font-family:Optima'>Music is what feelings sound like...Anon</span>.</span>

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Scranton, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    24
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I&#39;d say Beethoven does a great job of building the structure of a piece. He builds anticipation. Bach is my pick for conterpoint. Vivaldi and Handel share my award for tone color since they both change the main themes of their works so little throughout a piece, but it works. Chord Progression HAS to go to Chopin...and I also consider him for dynamics along with Tchaikovsky.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Quaverion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Posts
    279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Originally posted by Nox@Aug 14 2004, 07:51 PM
    ...mine too&#33;
    [snapback]1531[/snapback]
    I love how macabre it is&#33; It is just so fun to play&#33;
    It is our imperfections that make us who we are.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    223
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Originally posted by Rhadamanthus@Aug 17 2004, 08:18 PM
    I love how macabre it is&#33; It is just so fun to play&#33;
    [snapback]1564[/snapback]
    ...I haven&#39;t tried to play it...yet...LOL...give me some time...
    <span style='color:green'><span style='font-family:Optima'>Music is what feelings sound like...Anon</span>.</span>

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I enjoyed reading everyone&#39;s opinions here. I think Handel was the absolute master of counterpoint. I would rank Haydn and Dvorak best for chord progression overall, as well as Bach. Mozart and Beethoven for dynamics, Mozart, J. Strauss, and Mendelssohn for structure. Johann Strauss, and Tchaikovsky for melody, as well as Vivaldi and Albinoni. Haydn and Tchaikovsky for tone color, though I think Handel, Mozart, and Beethoven also did well. I think I would rank Bach and Handel best for overall harmony. It&#39;s so hard though to decide all these, since the different pieces are varied. :unsure: So there&#39;s my generalized opinion.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    near Munich/Germany
    Posts
    768
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Bach for counterpoint, Händel for free use of counterpoint and melodic lines, Beethoven for motif work, Schumann for melodic progres, Dvorak, Bruckner, R. Strauss for instrumentation, Schubert for melody and Mendelssohn for synthese of Counterpoint, melody, instrumentation and harmony.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    132
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Talents

    hello,
    Tone colour is all important to me in music, far more than form and melody, in deciding my likes and dislikes. So if I subdivided I'd say:

    Vivaldi for violins. He had the greatest understanding of them both as soloists and as a section.
    Ravel for woodwinds. He used woodwinds wonderfully.
    Strauss for the entire orchestra.
    Stravinsky for winds. He seems to have a more perfect understanding of them than even Strauss did ( however his string writing was poorer than Strauss' )

    For rythym, I'd say Bartok is one the best I've heard.
    Too many are great at form and melody for me to name them...
    godzilla

  10. #10
    Site owner emeritus James's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    61
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    virtuosity - paganini?
    Violinist
    Site creator, founder (Long time ago )
    http://www.classicalmusicworld.net

  11. #11
    Newbies
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    4
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by James
    virtuosity - paganini?
    Or Liszt perhaps?

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    22
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I would have to put Bach no. 1 in Structure, Melody, Counterpoint, Cantata, Spiritual Content, and Overall the greatest musician who ever lived and will live! PERIOD!
    Stravinsky is the Master of orchestration, harmony, rhythm, and economy!
    Beethoven is in a class all by himself and master of it all! The most well rounded composer/Musician!

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    35
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    counterpoint, bach. chord prog, rach. melody, schumann. form, beethoven and mozart.

  14. #14
    Newbies Grunthos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Without a doubt, couterpoint goes to Bach. He was too good at it. Just listen to Die Kunst der Fuge.
    Chord Progression, Chopin and Rachmaninov.
    Melody, Schubert.
    Harmony, Beethoven and Mozart.
    Virtuosity, obviously, Liszt and Paganini. And maybe even Rachmaninov.
    “If you're going to do a thing, you should do it thoroughly. If you're going to be a Christian, you may as well be a Catholic.”
    -Muriel Spark

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •