Banner: The symphonic suite Cantabile

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20

Thread: SS 10.11.18 - Bruckner #00

  1. #16
    Senior Member Merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    2,396
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Please be pretentious, for a change, Ken. Or be argumentative or enthusiastic or anything....... Just don't ever be dull (I doubt that's possible for you) . However, don't mention Wagner and Hitler again in the same sentence. Crap, I just did.
    Last edited by Merl; Nov-10-2018 at 10:04.

  2. Likes KenOC, realdealblues liked this post
  3. #17
    Senior Member Jeff W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Albany, NY
    Posts
    1,040
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D Smith View Post
    I just recently listened to the Skrowaczeski so I'll relisten to Young's excellent recording.

    I'm going to try to get back into the swing of thing so I'll go with this one as well.
    There's no point being grown-up if you can't be childish sometimes!

  4. Likes elgars ghost, realdealblues liked this post
  5. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Nashville, Tennessee
    Posts
    11,459
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tdc View Post
    . Perhaps Bruckner should have called it something else...
    Well, technically, he did call it Symphony No. 1, then he withdrew the number. Personally, I think Double-Aught is a pretty compelling title, at least as far as drawing my curiousity. (I remember before I got into Bruckner wondering how he ended up with a 0 and 00 in his output).

    Anyway, I'm listening to Simone Young; I think her recording has the best sound.
    Last edited by Manxfeeder; Nov-10-2018 at 17:13.

  6. Likes realdealblues liked this post
  7. #19
    Senior Member KenOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    17,493
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    I listened to Tintner’s performance twice.

    A bit of background: “Anton Bruckner's Symphony in F minor, WAB 99, was written in 1863, at the end of his study period in form and orchestration by Otto Kitzler.” It was not performed in his lifetime but received a premiere performance in 1924. It was published only in 1973 in an edition by Leopold Nowak.

    Kitzler called the work "not particularly inspired" which seems a fair judgment. But standards for works of that period are very high indeed. I’d place it about on a level with Dvorak’s earlier symphonies, perhaps not as melodic but also “tighter” in formal design and less diffuse.

    There’s not a lot of “Bruckner” to be heard here, though it doesn’t really sound very derivative of other composers either. But Bruckner’s voice can be clearly heard in the somewhat rub-a-dub scherzo. That’s the standout movement.

    The first movement is interesting enough to hold the attention of the listener alert for the usual road markers of the sonata form. The second (slow) movement is pleasant but unmemorable, though it improved for me on the second listen. The finale is probably the least effective movement. The orchestration sounds good and there are no obvious signs of amateurishness. This seems the work of somebody both talented and proficient, if “not particularly inspired,” as Kitzler has it.

    Overall, I enjoyed this but am unlikely to reach for it again soon. Most of the Bruckner cycles I have don’t include it, which must mean something…
    Last edited by KenOC; Nov-11-2018 at 03:06.


  8. Likes D Smith, realdealblues, Azol liked this post
  9. #20
    Senior Member realdealblues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    2,822
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KenOC View Post
    A question: In the last few cycles, I’ve taken to posting “mini reviews” of the Saturday Symphonies. Most symphonies I’ve not been familiar with and have been very interested to hear, and wanted to share my impressions.

    But most people don’t do this. Is it a welcome thing? Or is it just pretentious and unwelcome? Please let me know!
    Impressions, discussions have always been welcome. I use to write some years ago before I took over the SS duty. I was considering doing it again more recently but I barely have enough time to get online and make the post itself these days

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •