Joined
·
2,918 Posts
#158
4th Symphony
Robert Schumann
1841/revised 1851
A little controversy regarding the completion dates of Symphony No. 4 in D minor, Op 120 here: Clara Schumann, Robert's widow, later claimed on the first page of the score to the symphony, as published in 1882 as part of her husband's complete works (Robert Schumanns Werke, Herausgegeben von Clara Schumann, published by Breitkopf & Härtel), that the symphony had merely been sketched in 1841 but was only fully orchestrated ("vollstandig instrumentiert") in 1851. However, this was untrue, and his close friend Johannes Brahms, who greatly preferred the earlier version of the symphony, published that version in 1891 despite Clara's strenuous objections:
"It is a real pleasure to see anything so bright and spontaneous expressed
with corresponding ease and grace . . .
Everything is so absolutely natural that you cannot imagine it in any other way . . .
there are no harsh colors, no forced effects . . .
The score has not gained by being revised . . .
It has undoubtedly lost much of its charm, lightness of touch and clarity of expression."
Robert Schumann is far more recognized for his piano works, to the unjust neglect of his orchestral output. As you can tell from this excellent symphony, that neglect is undeserved.
In the revision it appears that he deliberately sought to create a richer, more full-bodied sound to match the earnestness of his musical ideas. Most music fans must agree, as it is the final version that usually is played and recorded.
Yet that hasn't stopped conductors AND composers (including Mahler, Berlioz, Gounod, Hans Pfitzner, Stravinsky, and Bernstein) from attempting to rework Schumann's orchestrations.
Here's Leonard Bernstein in a legendary performance with the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra
Bernstein observes Schumann's wish that there be no 'gap' between movements.
I. Andante con moto; from 00:00
II. Romanza: Andante; from 11:48
III. Scherzo: Presto; from 17:03 (!)
IV. Largo - Finale: Allegro vivace; from 22:32
One more thing - the Finale is generally well regarded. The final movement, like the first, has a slow introduction; in this case it serves as a bridge from the quiet conclusion of the scherzo to the dramatically charged finale proper, which commences with a dramatic proclamation of the theme and then cites other material from the preceding movements. A bustling orchestral build-up leads to a lusty fanfare from the horns and a robust Landler-like motif (actually derived from the theme) is introduced by the cellos during a brief respite before the final rush to the exuberant conclusion.
Also . . . note that Bernstein is conducting without the use of a score. Something very showmanlike and theatrical about that.
Well, son of a biscuit. Gone. Well, here's all FOUR Schumann Symphonies with Bernstein.
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶
4th Symphony
Robert Schumann
1841/revised 1851
A little controversy regarding the completion dates of Symphony No. 4 in D minor, Op 120 here: Clara Schumann, Robert's widow, later claimed on the first page of the score to the symphony, as published in 1882 as part of her husband's complete works (Robert Schumanns Werke, Herausgegeben von Clara Schumann, published by Breitkopf & Härtel), that the symphony had merely been sketched in 1841 but was only fully orchestrated ("vollstandig instrumentiert") in 1851. However, this was untrue, and his close friend Johannes Brahms, who greatly preferred the earlier version of the symphony, published that version in 1891 despite Clara's strenuous objections:
"It is a real pleasure to see anything so bright and spontaneous expressed
with corresponding ease and grace . . .
Everything is so absolutely natural that you cannot imagine it in any other way . . .
there are no harsh colors, no forced effects . . .
The score has not gained by being revised . . .
It has undoubtedly lost much of its charm, lightness of touch and clarity of expression."
Robert Schumann is far more recognized for his piano works, to the unjust neglect of his orchestral output. As you can tell from this excellent symphony, that neglect is undeserved.
In the revision it appears that he deliberately sought to create a richer, more full-bodied sound to match the earnestness of his musical ideas. Most music fans must agree, as it is the final version that usually is played and recorded.
Yet that hasn't stopped conductors AND composers (including Mahler, Berlioz, Gounod, Hans Pfitzner, Stravinsky, and Bernstein) from attempting to rework Schumann's orchestrations.
Here's Leonard Bernstein in a legendary performance with the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra
Bernstein observes Schumann's wish that there be no 'gap' between movements.
I. Andante con moto; from 00:00
II. Romanza: Andante; from 11:48
III. Scherzo: Presto; from 17:03 (!)
IV. Largo - Finale: Allegro vivace; from 22:32
One more thing - the Finale is generally well regarded. The final movement, like the first, has a slow introduction; in this case it serves as a bridge from the quiet conclusion of the scherzo to the dramatically charged finale proper, which commences with a dramatic proclamation of the theme and then cites other material from the preceding movements. A bustling orchestral build-up leads to a lusty fanfare from the horns and a robust Landler-like motif (actually derived from the theme) is introduced by the cellos during a brief respite before the final rush to the exuberant conclusion.
Also . . . note that Bernstein is conducting without the use of a score. Something very showmanlike and theatrical about that.
¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶¶