[Polednice]

Sorry to bring this back from the grave. In a moment of boredom, I flicked to the last page of threads and stumbled across this gem from 2004 - oh how the conversations have changed! In a fit of juvenile (but also ironic) humour, I thought that maybe there'd be just one other person who might snigger a tiny bit, even if all the rest of you severely lower your opinions of me (if possible!)

 

[Polednice]

I voted for human flesh.

Me too! I don't see why that isn't just the obvious answer, so long as we don't have to kill for it Apparently, it tastes just like pork.

 

[Polednice]

Go human flesh lol! The question is, who would you consume?

No question! I'd dig up a bit of Beethoven, some Brahms and a load of other composers and then I'd have a little composer-feast, hoping that their genius will be bestowed upon me! Although, maybe their flesh has passed its sell-by date...

 

[Polednice]

Ignoring the rest of the options in the poll, and without resorting to the obvious "one millionz plz", can anybody put an actual lowest reasonable fee on eating ****?

 

[Polednice]

Whose **** and what amount to be consumed. There's a big difference, in my mind at least, between a half teaspoon of Gywneth Paltrow's macrobiotic excrement and the whole chocolate explosion of an incontinent donkey.

And then I'm going to go out on a limb and say there are ample people in this weird world that would actually pay to monch on a bog log.

From these types of conversations with my friends over the years I can safely say there isn't a lot some people wouldn't do for money or at least say so in a hypothitical situation.

Oh, and blame Polednice for this descent into filth.

I would certainly like to probe this question further, but I daren't! Every exemplar turd that is travelling into my mind is far too graphic for me to mention - it would be both disturbing for others to read, and already has me disturbed about my own mental wellbeing (or at least another aspect of it)!

 

[Polednice]

For absolutely no amount of money...

Now then, was that a joke, or did you just accidentally stumble into an answer that really means that you'd eat it for free?

 

[Polednice]

No, mistake on my part... I wouldn't eat **** for any amount of money offered.

At the risk of being dully pedantic, that's not what you said the first time! The question was 'would you eat ****?', so you basically said, 'I would eat **** for no amount of money' i.e. 'I would eat **** for free'. I cannot believe I am having this discussion - what have I done?!

EDIT --- I only just saw the comma after "No" - I originally read it as "[There was] no mistake on my part", but I see that it could have been "No, there was a mistake on my part". I need a break!