Classical Music Forum banner

Who speaks to you more?

Ben Johnston vs. Lou Harrison

175 views 12 replies 7 participants last post by  Scorpion de Rooftrouser  
#1 ·
Ben Johnston: Expanded just intonation—especially in his string quartets, which are basically math puzzles in musical form (but still expressive). His work is dense and extremely precise, and he pushed Western classical instruments beyond their usual tuning. It’s not always an easy listen, but if you appreciate wild harmonies and system-based composition, it's incredibly rewarding.

Lou Harrison: He experimented with Eastern and Western fusion before it was trendy—gamelan, DIY instruments, weird scales, and more. His music comes off as more open and emotional than Johnston’s. Less theoretical, and more instinctual. It’s colorful, rhythmic, sometimes even playful. His love of sound for its own sake is obvious.

So basically:
  • Johnston bends pitch.
  • Harrison blends cultures.
  • One is a meticulous tuner, the other is a joyful experimenter.

Who speaks to you more?
 
#3 ·
I have never heard a note of Harrison, which I probably should rectify. I am a pretty big fan of Johnston's string quartets, probably my favorite cycle since Shostakovich, with 9 as a particular standout. I won't vote until I've heard a bit of Harrison. So, in the same vein as Entelekheia, any recommendations?
 
#10 ·
I'll admit that the singing in the final selection threw me. The string orchestra piece was nice, but that opening selection from the "chamber and gamelan" album was particularly neat. I'll vote Johnston, but I've marked that album as one to go through in the near-future. Thank you for bringing Harrison to my attention.
 
#13 ·
At first, I found Johnston’s work difficult to access, grounded in Western classical forms yet stretched through microtonal experimentation. Harrison, by contrast, was immediately more pleasurable. Over time, however, Johnston’s work has come to eclipse my preference for Harrison.