Joined
·
2,309 Posts
. . . or the student.
Rebel against your teachers and read on your own.
that looks like the sort of tosh you criticise Boulez for
. . . or the student.
Rebel against your teachers and read on your own.
This very French power allied with sweetness and style, for example:What 'power'?
No, she's right. I taught myself Latin, then had a private tutor, then read Classics at university. There's no doubt that my expensively educated contemporaries were far better informed than I was thanks to Eton, Westminster, King's Canterbury etc., but I personally wouldn't have developed the love for Latin literature that I did if someone had been forcing it down my throat from any early age. Not that the 'love' survived Oxford's insane workload either, but then that's just my dilettante nature.that looks like the sort of tosh you criticise Boulez for
I've heard it. I've heard it.
This is the best DVD. It has a fire breathing horse ...Don't judge me for this, but I've never tackled this work. Could someone give me any suggestions for a good recording?
Yes but you have to study it to get the full benefitI've heard it. I've heard it.![]()
...And Bryan Hymel is a sexy looking guy if you like them a little on the heavy side (which I doThis is the best DVD. It has a fire breathing horse ...
![]()
... and some damn fine singing as well :devil:
It was supposed to be Kaufmann singing Énée but he cancelled. I wasn't bothered as I wasn't interested in the tenor role but Fabio Capitanucci (Chorèbe), Anna Caterina Antonacci (Cassandre) and Eva-Maria Westbroek (Didon) were superb....And Bryan Hymel is a sexy looking guy if you like them a little on the heavy side (which I do) but I've yet to be convinced that he is the saviour of the French heroic tenor repertoire. I have heard his album 'Heroïque', on which the Sigurd aria was quite well sung, but based on that CD I don't find him an exciting singer overall: stiff, unexpressive and sometimes with a bit of a wobble on the loud/high notes. A shame.
Also if it's the production I'm thinking of, it had some strange multicoloured tunics which were possibly on loan from Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Coat, not much to do with either Virgil's time or Berlioz's.
![]()
What does burning down opera houses and spitting on rival composers have to do with enlightenment?that looks like the sort of tosh you criticise Boulez for
Just not by any 'virile' standard.YUP, MUCH better............
Quite a lot of schoolboys I know hated Shakespeare too. Schoolchildren aren't necessarily the arbiters of good taste. Many of them like Justin Bieber, for instance.Oh come on Blair! Hating Virgil was a passion for generations of British schoolboys! we were taught by an old boy who might just have known Virgil himself. We used to amuse ourselves by making chalk marks on the back of his gown as he passed us. Fond memories!
. . .or even like, going down a couple of notches, 'Jethro Tull.'Quite a lot of schoolboys I know hated Shakespeare too. Schoolchildren aren't necessarily the arbiters of good taste. Many of them like Justin Bieber, for instance.
. . .or even like, going down a couple of notches, 'Jethro Tull.'
Sorry, I forget there are other Fächer, especially in this repertoire.It was supposed to be Kaufmann singing Énée but he cancelled. I wasn't bothered as I wasn't interested in the tenor role but Fabio Capitanucci (Chorèbe), Anna Caterina Antonacci (Cassandre) and Eva-Maria Westbroek (Didon) were superb.
Isn't that what Justine. . . excuse me, 'Justin'. . . says?HA, Any publicity is good publicity...................
![]()
I prefer the cornets in the Symphonie Fantastique too.It is worth noting that Berlioz wanted saxhorns & valved cornets in much of Troyens and it makes all the difference when you hear them in the piece. Certainly a modern horn sounds incredible but it isn't HIPWhen it came to orchestration, Berlioz really knew what he was doing.
Perhaps it is because of my classical way of listening (no frills, just an Arcam CD player + Arcam amplifier + 2 Von Schweickert speakers), but I hear tremendous differences between the Philips analogue recording of Davis 1, the live LSO digital recording of Davis 2 and the glorious Decca recording of Dutoit. The Philips recording is nice for the voices but lacking in orchestral depth. The LSO recording is live, with understandable balance problems, distracting sounds etc. as it should be, because it is a live recording... But the Decca recording is another class, top of the bill when it comes to spaciousness, balance, atmosphere. There is a soprano miscast in the Dutoit recording, but my attention is elegantly directed towards the orchestral details. There you go with Berlioz from strength to strength.Don't judge me for this, but I've never tackled this work. Could someone give me any suggestions for a good recording?
I'm afraid I don't think Dutoit comes within a mile of Davis's understanding of the score, of his affinity with Berlioz. Nor does he thrill the way Davis does in so many important passages. I'll take performance over sound quality any time, and, believe me, anmhe, the sound quality on both Davis sets is more than acceptable.Perhaps it is because of my classical way of listening (no frills, just an Arcam CD player + Arcam amplifier + 2 Von Schweickert speakers), but I hear tremendous differences between the Philips analogue recording of Davis 1, the live LSO digital recording of Davis 2 and the glorious Decca recording of Dutoit. The Philips recording is nice for the voices but lacking in orchestral depth. The LSO recording is live, with understandable balance problems, distracting sounds etc. as it should be, because it is a live recording... But the Decca recording is another class, top of the bill when it comes to spaciousness, balance, atmosphere. There is a soprano miscast in the Dutoit recording, but my attention is elegantly directed towards the orchestral details. There you go with Berlioz from strength to strength.
. . . all of which I agree with- except for the sound quality part: the sound quality on the 1969 Philips Davis/Covent Garden performance is stellar in every way.I'm afraid I don't think Dutoit comes within a mile of Davis's understanding of the score, of his affinity with Berlioz. Nor does he thrill the way Davis does in so many important passages. I'll take performance over sound quality any time, and, believe me, anmhe, the sound quality on both Davis sets is more than acceptable.