Classical Music Forum banner
181 - 200 of 216 Posts
Hurwitz did a massive Messiah review a couple of days ago. Just about fell out of my chair when he eventually announced Pinnock as his top pick. Plenty of other HIP recommendations along the way too, including Higginbottom's all-male version with New College, Oxford.

A few months ago, I think it would have been a very different story. His reviews of Baroque and earlier music have changed out of sight.
 
Hurwitz did a massive Messiah review a couple of days ago. Just about fell out of my chair when he eventually announced Pinnock as his top pick. Plenty of other HIP recommendations along the way too, including Higginbottom's all-male version with New College, Oxford.

A few months ago, I think it would have been a very different story. His reviews of Baroque and earlier music have changed out of sight.
Pinnock would certainly be one of my top picks. It is also one of the topics of the penguin guide and of the gramophone It is a very well sung version with a huge understanding of Handel's medium. von Otter is superb and none of the other soloists let the side down.
I would put McCreesh's version slightly above it perhaps although it is a case of roundabouts and swings.
I find Gardiner's slightly disappointing. The bass is not very good
I have recently acquired Christie's which is absolutely stunning.
Hickox not quite on their level but a sound performance
 
On a Messiah listening kick right now. So many that I had not heard before.

Marriner has been the biggest revelation. It's one of the few where I just want to keep listening. I think Marriner suffers perhaps from having so many recordings that he comes across as "generic baroque guy." But this Messiah is really excellent. Maybe even more recommendable than Pinnock, which though excellent does seem to have a constant lid over the emotions.

I think I slightly prefer this inspired 1976 Marriner to the 1966 Davis. The Davis is very good, but I constantly feel as if everything is missing a bit of spark and energy. Everything is served up kind of pedantically. Meat and potatoes.

Beecham's second recording, from 1947, really impressed me. Right up there with the 1946 Sargent among my favorites regardless of sound quality. I listened again to the 1959 RCA and came away feeling it is overdone. The intended feelings from the work fail to connect, like I'm being pounded over the head.

One recording I did not like very much was Layton, though I can see why others like it. It is absolutely perfect, as if performed by robots. It left me cold. It was like hearing everything I don't like about modern performances encapsulated in a single recording. Everyone is obsessed with being perfect these days. Where is the humanity? Where is the soul? The final movement is at least exciting and worth hearing.

McCreesh - horrendously fast

Mackerras/EMI - loved it. Exhuberant and ornamented. Great solo work.

Need to sample Pearlman/Boston Baroque
 
One recording I did not like very much was Layton, though I can see why others like it. It is absolutely perfect, as if performed by robots. It left me cold. It was like hearing everything I don't like about modern performances encapsulated in a single recording. Everyone is obsessed with being perfect these days. Where is the humanity? Where is the soul? The final movement is at least exciting and worth hearing.
Hmm. I found it to be the exact opposite. Pretty well everyone is note-perfect nowadays and the reason Layton stands out, in my opinion, is just how excited everyone seems to be to be playing Handel's Messiah. The singers are just so joyous the recording is positively infectious. The final movement is incredible, I don't understand why so many critics admonished Layton's decision to get rid of the accompaniment in the opening; it works well and there are ten million recordings with the accompaniment if you really need it so badly. To be honest, some critics seem to be allergic to people doing different things unless it makes the work cleaner, colder, and, most importantly, more modern.

As for older recordings, Klemperer's is the sort of recording that shouldn't work but does anyway. His Hallelujah chorus is the best I've heard (yes, even better than Beechman).
 
Finished my Messiah survey, though doubtless several of you will now recommend a good dozen or so I skipped over!

The biggest surprise was Butt/Dundein Consort. As some might know, I am rarely wowed by recent recordings, but this one was quite the revelation. Among older versions I also was surprised to take a liking to the Richter, which a few have recommended on this thread.

I did not like Klemperer very much at all. The approach was just too heavy.

Solti was a disappointment. Very clinical and dull. Not what I was expecting even though Solti often sounds that way. With Messiah he almost sounds as if he was simply fulfilling recording duties.

Shaw has excellent singers, but his conducting is painfully metronomic. Ugh.

So here are my 12 "essentials," with several more listed as "further listening:"

Image


Sir Malcolm Sargent/Huddersfield Ch. Society/Liverpool PO (1946) (Dutton, Documents)

Sargent presents the Messiah as a grand epic, and the result is compellingly dramatic. Every word and note means something, and the choir in particular displays a unique drive and commitment. The soloists are likewise consummately expressive. The sound quality requires tolerance, but the Dutton remastering is quite exceptional. The greater hurdle for the modern listener might be the slow tempos in some of the choral numbers, but this is an interpretation which above all emphasizes dramatic narrative over deft virtuosity.

Neville Marriner/Academy and Ch. of St. Martin-in-the-Fields (1976) (Decca)


With an excellent mix of spirited charm and warmth, this is a perfect middle ground between old-fashioned and period style. Tempos are well chosen, the singing is uniformly excellent, and the orchestra exudes a unique gracefulness. The sound balance and clarity are superlative.

Trevor Pinnock/The English Consort & Ch. (1988) (DG Archiv)


This justly celebrated period performance conveys an ethereal, eloquent, contained beauty with excellent singing. The pacing is patient, never rushed. Above all there is an inspired commitment that sets it apart. The sound is clear and well balanced.

Sir Charles Mackerras/Ambrosian Singers/English CO (1967) (EMI)


A uniquely joyful, inspired account with excellent soloists, this was an early attempt to incorporate baroque performance practice with modern instruments, including heavy ornamentation which is either stylish or overdone, depending upon one's taste. The choir sings with extraordinary exhuberance.

John Butt/Dunedin Consort & Players (2006) (Linn)


With a dry, minimalist approach set against a reverbert acoustic, this swift period performance is uniquely arresting from beginning to end. Every movement is presented freshly, with great attention to text and meaning. The singers are closely miked, making for an intimate presentation.

Sir Thomas Beecham/Royal PO & Ch. (1947) (Biddulph, Classica D'Oro)


Beecham's second Messiah recording is highly romanticized though not as bombastic as his later famous reorchestrated stereo version. He provides an eloquently firm hand throughout, the chorus is expressive and thrillingly dramatic, and the soloists are of high caliber if overly sentimental by modern standards. The sound quality is of course limited, but not too obtrusively so that the ear adjusts.

Sir Colin Davis/London SO & Ch. (1966) (Philips)


A ground-breaking recording which married baroque sensibility to modern performance style, resulting in a uniquely inspired, committed performance that represents for many the quintessential Messiah interpetation. The singing is beautifully full and expressive even if the effect feels a bit too labored at times. The sound is full and clear.

Paul McCreesh/Gabrieli Consort & Players (1997) (DG Archiv)


A refreshingly bold period instrument version featuring spirited technical brilliance. The execution is faultless, though the interpretation is somewhat chilly and at times unnecessarily fast. The sound is clear and present, accentuating the directness of the performance.

Karl Richter/John Alldis Ch./London PO (1972) (DG)


An expansive, stately modern instrument version that will strike many as anachronistic, but what sets this version apart is the quality of performance from all involved and inspired dedication such that it holds interest throughout. The sound is excellent, opulent and full.

Christopher Hogwood/Ch. of Christ Church Cathedral/Academy of Ancient Music (1980) (Decca/L'Oiseau-Lyre)


This pioneering period performance uses a boy soprano section, which fits with the relatively cool, sedate interpretation. While this approach may not appeal to all, its unassuming simplicity offers a transcendent listening experience.

Andrew Davis/Toronto Sym. & Mendelssohn Ch. (1987) (EMI)


This is an old-fashioned large-scale Messiah, presented without any hint of idiosyncrasy. Although the choir may not be the last word in dexterity or tonal beauty, they effectively communicate the joy of the work such that with an excellent team of soloists this can be confidently recommended, particularly as an introduction.

Harry Christophers/The Sixteen Ch. & Orch. (1997) (Hyperion)

This may not be your typical thrill-a-minute Messiah, but it is an exquisitely noble, small-scaled period performance that lets the music unfold naturally at a relatively patient pace. The sheer beauty and quality of the singing are hard to beat, helped by clear, present sound quality.

Further listening:

Martin Pearlman/Boston Baroque (1992) (Telarc)

Sir Malcolm Sargent/Huddersfield Ch. Society/Liverpool PO (1959) (EMI/CfP)

William Christie/Les Arts Florissants Ch. & Orch. (1993) (Harmonia Mundi)

John Rutter/Cambridge Singers/Royal PO (2007) (Collegium, Hendrickson)

Sir Adrian Boult/London SO & Ch. (1960) (Decca), Edward Higginbottom/Ch. Of New College Oxford/Academy of Ancient Music (2006) (Naxos)

Sir Thomas Beecham/Royal PO & Ch. (arr. Goossens) (1959) (RCA)

Nikolaus Harnoncourt/Stockholm Kammerkoren/Concentus Musicus Wien (1982) (Teldec)

Andrew Parrott/Taverner Ch. & Players (1989) (EMI, Erato)

Stephen Cleobury/Ch. Of King's College/Brandenburg Consort (1993) (Decca/Argo), Sir Charles Mackerras/ORF Ch. & SO (German, arr. Mozart) (1974) (DG Archiv)

Raymond Leppard/English Chamber Orch. & Ch. (1974) (Erato)

Sir Thomas Beecham/BBC SO & Ch. (1927) (Pearl, Grammofono2000)

Masaaki Suzuki/Bach Collegium Japan (1996) (BIS)

Stephen Layton/Polyphony/Britten Sinfonia (2008) (Hyperion)

Ton Koopman/The Sixteen/Amsterdam Baroque Orch. (1983) (Erato)

Harry Christophers/The Sixteen Ch. & Orch. (2007) (Coro), John Eliot Gardiner/Monteverdi Ch./English Baroque Soloists (1987) (Philips/Decca)

Wolfgang Katschner/Dresdner Kammerchor/Lautten Compagney (German) (2004) (Deutsche Harmonia Mundi)

Václav Luks/Collegium 1704 Orch. & Ch. (2019) (Accent)

Richard Hickox/Collegium Musicum (1991) (Chandos)

John Alldis/London PO & Ch. (2002) (Sparrow)

Robert Shaw/Robert Shaw Orch. & Ch. (1966) (RCA)

Sir Georg Solti/CSO & Ch. (1985) (Decca)

Eugene Ormandy/Mormon Tabernacle Ch./Philadelphia Orch. (1959) (Sony)

Frieder Bernius/Stuttgart Barockorch. & Kammerch. (2008) (Carus-Verlag)

Otto Klemperer/Philharmonia Ch. & Orch. (1964) (EMI)

Hermann Scherchen/London PO & CH. (1954) (Archipel, Virtuoso)

.
 
Robert Shaw on Telarc for me. I have Beecham's later version but it's sounds too old fashioned.
 
Robert Shaw on Telarc for me. I have Beecham's later version but it's sounds too old fashioned.
I have it too. Worth keeping for the soloists. It is of course noting that Handel was a great arranger of his own music and ouldn't have turned a hair at Goosen's orchestrations. But Beecham's tempi for the choruses now seem unduly slow.
 
I wasn't aware Jordi Savall had recorded a Messiah and being a big fan I was looking forward to hearing it. I was not impressed in spite of a first class sounding orchestra and chorus, what did me in was the Counter-Tenor Damien Guillon from his first appearance didn't do it for me and in fact turned me off. I am in general in favour of a counter-tenor but not in this case. I played Gardiner, Harry Christophers and they are still unbeatable and on equal footing William Christie... just my humble opinion.
 
I am floored. I was going to say that all things considered, there is no better Messiah recording than Pearlman, and here you have made it the first recommendation in this thread. Not only is it a wonderful recording (all the right voices etc.) but because there are no top stars on it, it generally floats under the radar and can be picked up used online for peanuts. I have picked up copies for as little as $6 (including shipping) to give to others.

Pinnock is a near perfect set, but what kills it for me is that pesky countertenor. :eek: At least they did also have some of the alto parts still sung by a woman.
Based on this and others' comments, I bought the Pearlman. Couldn't be happier!
 
181 - 200 of 216 Posts