Joined
·
3,070 Posts
Of course, I was just being a pedant!True. I do, however, hope that it was clear out of the context that my opinions on Tchaikovsky's vc are subjective at best.
Of course, I was just being a pedant!True. I do, however, hope that it was clear out of the context that my opinions on Tchaikovsky's vc are subjective at best.
Agreed! In my opinion, everything Arnold did was at least enjoyable and interesting!Slightly off-thread, but I was listening to Arnold's Concerto for Two Violins and Orchestra earlier. I wouldn't rank it up there with Barber, Beethoven, Sibelius et al but it's an enjoyable and interesting piece.
Arnold composed nearly 20 concertos for various combinations - I don't think there is anything particularly earth-shattering about any of the ones I've heard but as you rightly say that doesn't mean that they can't be savoured on a different level. Although the concerto for two violins and strings is one of those in which Arnold is wearing a somewhat serious expression I think elsewhere he also used the concerto medium intentionally as a conduit for a whole gamut of emotions, hence the large number of them. All in all, an intriguing body of work and well worth investigating.Slightly off-thread, but I was listening to Arnold's Concerto for Two Violins and Orchestra earlier. I wouldn't rank it up there with Barber, Beethoven, Sibelius et al but it's an enjoyable and interesting piece.
I am personally not too fond of the Tchaikovsky but I can understand why it is so famous and it is a well composed piece.I cannot think of a single violin concerto of a major composer that isn't great, except for maybe Tchaikovsky which is awful.
I do , I have the tzhak Perlman as my favourite. Might give it a spin later.Somebody who like Goldmark violin concerto?
It's one of my favourite violin concertos (Beethoven, Brahms, Dvorak, Tchaikovsky and Shostakovich 1)