Classical Music Forum banner

Better Nicknames

7047 Views 50 Replies 26 Participants Last post by  MoonlightSonata
I was just thinking about the famous works that are usually referred to by their nicknames, and about the nicknames that don't fit. The two that came to mind were Beethoven's "Moonlight" and "Tempest" sonatas, both nicknames given by publishers/biographers because of myths on what the music is "supposed to be about"

I'm not against nicknames; I think they make it easier to remember the piece, and they also can sum up the mood of the work, or what the listener should think about when listening. Yet there are pieces with nicknames, like the two mentioned, that aren't the best.

So, what are some pieces that you guys think have good nicknames? How about pieces you think have bad nicknames? And for the bad ones, what could be a better nickname? Or maybe, the piece shouldn't even have one at all!
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 2 of 51 Posts
To eliminate any trace of unwanted romanticism, I propose names in binary code. For example, "Did you hear Beethoven's 011010011??", "Mozart's later 01100011 is way better than his well known 0110111110". Imagine the program notes:

J.S.Bach:

001100011

001101001

011101010
  • Like
Reactions: 4
There may be more than 512 pieces of classical music, unfortunately for your system.
Yeah... but... who listens to those other pieces anyway? :)
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 2 of 51 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top