Classical Music Forum banner

Better Nicknames

7050 Views 50 Replies 26 Participants Last post by  MoonlightSonata
I was just thinking about the famous works that are usually referred to by their nicknames, and about the nicknames that don't fit. The two that came to mind were Beethoven's "Moonlight" and "Tempest" sonatas, both nicknames given by publishers/biographers because of myths on what the music is "supposed to be about"

I'm not against nicknames; I think they make it easier to remember the piece, and they also can sum up the mood of the work, or what the listener should think about when listening. Yet there are pieces with nicknames, like the two mentioned, that aren't the best.

So, what are some pieces that you guys think have good nicknames? How about pieces you think have bad nicknames? And for the bad ones, what could be a better nickname? Or maybe, the piece shouldn't even have one at all!
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 1 of 51 Posts
When someone says Schubert's Unfinished they usually mean the one in B minor, but Schubert left 6 unfinished symphonies, though that one is probably the best of them, (though the "Last" in D major has an absolutely awesome 2nd movement) and the nickname gives the work a "mysterious" aura the music does have.
Bruckner gave his 1st symphony the nickname "The Saucy maid". I mean, how cool is that?
The quartets Rosamunde and Death and the Maiden were not given those names by the composer, but I like them.
Then there are those nicknames so terrible that no one uses them. Ever heard of Chopin's "Raindrop" Prelude? Yes? And what about the "Thou Art So Like a Flower" Prelude? Or the "Suicide" Prelude? No?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preludes_(Chopin)#Descriptions
  • Like
Reactions: 3
1 - 1 of 51 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top