I cannot think of a single 1st Symphony that would beat The Brahms. Unbelievably heavy-weight stuff.A more interesting, and closer, match would be Sibelius 1 and Mahler 1 or Brahms 1.
Wow.A few months ago I ran a game of 1st symphonies.
Top Ten:
1. Mahler - Symphony no. 1
2. Brahms - Symphony no. 1
3. Sibelius - Symphony no. 1
4. Tchaikovsky, P. - Symphony no. 1
5. Dutilleux - Symphony no. 1
6. Elgar - Symphony no. 1
7. Scriabin - Symphony no. 1
8. Weinberg - Symphony no. 1
9. Schumann - Symphony no. 1 "Spring"
10. Kalinnikov - Symphony no. 1
10. Martinů - Symphony no. 1
Personally, I would have replaced the Tchaikovsky and Kalinnikov with Shostakovich, Bax, or maybe Vaughan Williams.
You think Haydn's and Mozart's 1st symphonies are that good?Wow.
Wow, no Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, or Schubert.
Not really all that familiar with any of the 1st Symphonies other than Beethoven's.You think Haydn's and Mozart's 1st symphonies are that good?
Yes, very much so.I mean, really, was Weinberg's 1st better than Haydn's 1st?
Yes, they were the heavyweights but their 1st symphonies were not.Not really all that familiar with any of the 1st Symphonies other than Beethoven's.
I'm more surprised that the heavyweights of the Classical era were shut out of the Top Ten so easily.
I mean, really, was Weinberg's 1st better than Haydn's 1st?
Nope, that's not it. I've never heard Weinberg's 1st Symphony. In fact, I don't recall ever hearing the name Weinberg before. Or maybe I have, but have just forgotten.Yes, they were the heavyweights but their 1st symphonies were not.
Looks like you're not a fan of Weinberg's 1st. For me, it's one of the most enjoyable 1st symphonies.