Joined
·
3 Posts
You are correct. We have been down this path many times before.This thread looks familiar, but I'll contribute - Bach by a large margin over all others.
...and where is Britten? Out of the list I chose Stravinsky.Beethoven, on the strength of his late works.
Why did you put Clara Schumann on the list instead of Shostakovich, Schoenberg, Bruckner, or Monteverdi?
Or "Why did you put Chopin and Rachmaninov on the list instead of Tippett and Judith Weir?"Beethoven, on the strength of his late works.
Why did you put Clara Schumann on the list instead of Shostakovich, Schoenberg, Bruckner, or Monteverdi?
It's sad because she may have had the musical potential to stand with the others but was marred by societal expectations, responsibilities as a wife and a mother, her concert career, and self-doubtThis thread looks familiar, but I'll contribute - Bach by a large margin over all others.
By the way, Clara Schumann stands out here like a sore thumb.
Or Hayden instead of Haydn?Or "Why did you put Chopin and Rachmaninov on the list instead of Tippett and Judith Weir?"
I'm just saying that Clara Schumann is not popular, but the four I mentioned are. Monteverdi-- probably the most famous early music composer, and a real innovator. Shostakovich-- one of the most popular 20th century composers, with famous symphonies and a well-regarded set of string quartets. Schoenberg-- influential, and many like his music. Bruckner-- not that popular among casual CM fans but popular enough here that he could get a vote or two.Or "Why did you put Chopin and Rachmaninov on the list instead of Tippett and Judith Weir?"
While outstanding the number of identical threads, the topic never really tires!This thread looks familiar, but I'll contribute