Classical Music Forum banner
61 - 80 of 131 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
2,446 Posts
He sounds like someone who practiced some scales. He probably learned how to do that at Julliard.
I assume you're joking, but SRV had no formal training. Like a lot of blues/jazz guys most of his learning came from practicing to his favorite artists from an early age. He started at age 7 and by age 11 he was already playing local gigs, eventually becoming one of the biggest acts in Texas and, even later, paving the way for the blues revival of the 80s. He's one of those guys who played/practiced his instrument obsessively and it shows in his playing. He's widely regarded as one of the best guitarists ever with a style that is nearly inimitable.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
8,937 Posts
Discussion Starter · #62 ·
I assume you're joking, but SRV had no formal training. Like a lot of blues/jazz guys most of his learning came from practicing to his favorite artists from an early age. He started at age 7 and by age 11 he was already playing local gigs, eventually becoming one of the biggest acts in Texas and, even later, paving the way for the blues revival of the 80s. He's one of those guys who played/practiced his instrument obsessively and it shows in his playing. He's widely regarded as one of the best guitarists ever with a style that is nearly inimitable.
While I agree SRV is more technically impressive, I feel more sense of color and deeper sense of emotion from Depp. I think Depp is the greater artist of the two, but SRV is the better musician. I prefer artists to musicians.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
8,937 Posts
Discussion Starter · #64 ·
since when exactly? Because I live in a world where mainstream pop artists make music that can't be further from my idea of elegance.
The timeless classics that got noticed such as the Bond films, My Fair Lady, Early Beatles and etc are all examples of mainstream elegance in art.

There are of course, always, hidden gems that don't get noticed and it's our job to make them known, as fans of art!

:)
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,452 Posts
The timeless classics that got noticed such as the Bond films, My Fair Lady, Early Beatles and etc are all examples of mainstream elegance in art.

There are of course, always, hidden gems that don't get noticed and it's our job to make them known, as fans of art!

:)
do you realize that we are in 2023 and not in the sixties? The masses don't have a preference for elegance.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,446 Posts
While I agree SRV is more technically impressive, I feel more sense of color and deeper sense of emotion from Depp. I think Depp is the greater artist of the two, but SRV is the better musician. I prefer artists to musicians.
OK, but you should understand that nobody else is in your brain and can understand why you're hearing "color and emotion" from the Depp piece, but only "better technique" from SRV. I'd wager that if you gave both tracks to a random pool of people the vast majority would be getting more emotion out of the SRV piece... I mean, there's a reason he's one of the best-selling blues artists of all time and it isn't because average people just thought he was a skilled technician.
 

· Registered
Sibelius, Beethoven, Satie, Debussy
Joined
·
3,067 Posts
The only thing that makes any art special is that it does something for you, buddy.
And guitar solos don't usually do it for me, mate. Having seen the likes of Phil Miller, Gary Moore, Allan Holdsworth and Zappa in concert ( not together, you understand) I can admire their technical skill, but I much prefer the more modest breaks of Steve Hackett.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
8,937 Posts
Discussion Starter · #77 ·
OK, but you should understand that nobody else is in your brain and can understand why you're hearing "color and emotion" from the Depp piece, but only "better technique" from SRV. I'd wager that if you gave both tracks to a random pool of people the vast majority would be getting more emotion out of the SRV piece... I mean, there's a reason he's one of the best-selling blues artists of all time and it isn't because average people just thought he was a skilled technician.

Ya, they are selling the image of him being a rock and roll hero. It's not real music.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
145 Posts
I assume you're joking, but SRV had no formal training. Like a lot of blues/jazz guys most of his learning came from practicing to his favorite artists from an early age. He started at age 7 and by age 11 he was already playing local gigs, eventually becoming one of the biggest acts in Texas and, even later, paving the way for the blues revival of the 80s. He's one of those guys who played/practiced his instrument obsessively and it shows in his playing. He's widely regarded as one of the best guitarists ever with a style that is nearly inimitable.
Yes, I was kidding. I was in high school in the early 70s when Johnny Winter (who didn't go to Julliard either) was the big blues guitarist out of Texas. Then SRV showed up and Johnny had company. Both of them could rip it up.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
9,237 Posts
I had the pleasure of seeing SRV live at Reading in 1983 and can confirm thay he was up there with the best guitarists I've ever seen live (EVH, Fripp, Schenker, Rhoads, Marino, Nugent, Gallagher, Trower, Clemson, Lifeson, etc). His set that day short and spectacular. Somewhere I have a rubbish picture I took of him onstage from a distance. We were waiting for someone else on the other stage. If id have known how good he was going to be I'd have got down the front of the other stage with my camera.
 
61 - 80 of 131 Posts
Top