Classical Music Forum banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
363 Posts
Yes, Columbia Records: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_Symphony_Orchestra

My understanding is that it was easier to put together a group of musicians for the purpose of making in-house recordings, rather than worry about conflicting recording contracts and fee schedules for all parties involved. Many of the Columbia Symphony musicians were from the Los Angeles Philharmonic, but it was simpler from a copyright standpoint to record them as the Columbia Symphony Orchestra. Also the other orchestras mbhaub mentioned with Columbia contracts did not include the LA Philharmonic, and Columbia needed a West Coast orchestra for Bruno Walter, among other reasons.
 
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
Top