I can't watch the first one with Siepi. The second with Ghiaurov, i find the voice a little breathy, and i want the recitative to be crispier, rhythmically speaking.
MAS, have you listened to this? The "teacher" in this masterclass, she's pretty good, ehThe aria, however zzzzz.
@tsquare07,MAS, have you listened to this? The "teacher" in this masterclass, she's pretty good, eh
But seriously, when she says "Vieni, o Levita", you could hear all the conviction of a priest in just one phrase. Her tempo is faster than the 2 above. And she knows that the "Le" in Levita needs to be accentuated because the "Le" is set on a sixthteen note. To do that you need technical ability to not break the legato and sensitivity to the music to pick up the detail.
Whenever I hear Siepi the word 'ponderous' comes to mind, as if the voice is incapable of moving quickly. I agree that he is preferable to Ghiaurov however. I too prefer the more lively voices of basses like Pinza and Plancon.At least as heard here, Siepi is notably superior to Ghiaurov in native vocal endowment. I was initially impressed, but as the aria proceeded I was lulled into a semi-torpor by the slow tempo and the unvarying darkness, weight and smoothness of Siepi's voice. I never did find Siepi a very interesting artist, and so it is here. I was hoping that Ghiaurov would find some way to wake me up. Well, he did sound a bit more emphatic or fervent in spots. But when these estimable gents had finished I turned to the first singer I ever heard in this aria, Ezio Pinza. It was a late recording, and his voice had lost a little of its ease and lustre, but he took the piece at a tempo that that shaved a whole minute off it, much to its benefit.