Joined
·
2,838 Posts
We are discussing Macbeth Sleepwalking Scene and Callas, which started me on opera!Maybe I will start the separate thread about Callas, so that we stay on the topic here, i.e. the operas which made us like operas![]()
We are discussing Macbeth Sleepwalking Scene and Callas, which started me on opera!Maybe I will start the separate thread about Callas, so that we stay on the topic here, i.e. the operas which made us like operas![]()
There is a thread on Callas’s Recorded Legacy, in Opera on DVD Blu-ray and CDWe are discussing Macbeth Sleepwalking Scene and Callas, which started me on opera!
I've said this before, but there are quite a few new posters and so it's worth repeating. I am familiar with most of Callas' recordings, both in the studio and live (although some of the live material I have only heard once) and her complete recording of Butterfly has long been a favourite of mine. I never saw Callas live and have never been to Chicago and her only run as Cio-Cio San was over twenty years before I was born. However, when some footage of her as Butterfly from one of the rehearsals in Chicago was released in colour a few years ago, I had the sensation that I had seen it before, despite knowing that it was totally new for me (it was known to exist and was probably on YouTube in black and white, but I hadn't seen it). I then realised that the reason it felt so familiar was that the way that Callas sang the part, could only be accompanied by those movements. There really was a totality to her art whereby the drama of the opera was expressed as an organic whole made up of both movement and vocal delivery seamlessly fused together.OMG! That same aria had quite an effect on me too. I was already a Callas fan, but the Verdi Arias disc was no longer available and a friend lent it to me. Even knowing Callas as I did, I was staggered and I've never heard anyone else realise that scene with anything like her insight. Verdi's setting itself was quite a revelation, but it was Callas's incredibly detailed interpretation that stunned me. She has a different colour for every single thought that flits through Lady Macbeth's fractured mind. Close inspection of the score reveals that it is all there in Verdi's instructions but how many other singers have carried them out so brilliantly? I can't think of a single one. Part of the miracle is that, even with all the detail she reveals, there is no artifice and the end result sounds totally spontaneous. This really is the art that conceals art and it is one of the arias I would play to friends if they doubted Callas's pre-eminence as a vocal actress.
A friend of the critic John Steane once said to him about Callas, "Of course you had to see her," to which he replied, "Oh, but I can! And I do!" I know exactly what he meant.
An operaholic and Fidelioholic if we go by your posts on TC!Beethoven's Fidelio, the Bernstein DVD. That tipped the scales and I became an operaholic from there on out.
This isn't a thread about Callas, but we are talking about our operaratic breakthroughs and it would appear that for many the voice of Callas was one of those breakthrough moments. Many of Callas's contemporaries would no doubt agree that she was known for her acting skills, but the point they often make is that she was her acting was musically conceived. It was the way she interpreted the music. She needed music to inspire her. I often think her equivalent in the dance world would have been Margot Fonteyn, who was a wonderfully musical dancer, her acting coming as a response to the musical impulse.I've said this before, but there are quite a few new posters and so it's worth repeating. I am familiar with most of Callas' recordings, both in the studio and live (although some of the live material I have only heard once) and her complete recording of Butterfly has long been a favourite of mine. I never saw Callas live and have never been to Chicago and her only run as Cio-Cio San was over twenty years before I was born. However, when some footage of her as Butterfly from one of the rehearsals in Chicago was released in colour a few years ago, I had the sensation that I had seen it before, despite knowing that it was totally new for me (it was known to exist and was probably on YouTube in black and white, but I hadn't seen it). I then realised that the reason it felt so familiar was that the way that Callas sang the part, could only be accompanied by those movements. There really was a totality to her art whereby the drama of the opera was expressed as an organic whole made up of both movement and vocal delivery seamlessly fused together.
N.
Callas was also an influence on my opera listening too, although she came after the live Fidelio and Trovatore I saw. I think the first thing I heard her sing was Un bel di from Butterfly, heard on the radio and then I had a cassette I made from random arias. The first complete opera I heard her in was either Cav (I got the Cav/Pag complete LPs out of the library) or Rigoletto (heard on the radio). The first of her recordings I actually owned was the first complete opera I had on CD: The De Sabata Tosca.This isn't a thread about Callas, but we are talking about our operaratic breakthroughs and it would appear that for many the voice of Callas was one of those breakthrough moments. Many of Callas's contemporaries would no doubt agree that she was known for her acting skills, but the point they often make that she was only an acting was musically conceived. Her acting was the way she interpreted the music. I often think her equivalent in the dance world would have been Margot Fonteyn, who was a wonderfully musical dancer, her acting coming as a response to the musical impulse.
I have a similar experience, albeit born in 71. I grew up with Opera and other classical music generally. I had my first violin by the time I was 5, and have been playing instruments of one form or another ever since. My parents had no Callas recordings, although I do recall quite a lot of Sutherland, Tebaldi, and Schwarzkopf. I still have quite a fondness for Schwarzkopf's voice now, as you can tell if you see my poll votes! Sadly they binned all of their Vinyl after I moved out and they changed to a CD system!It is interesting, that Callas was a factor for you guys in liking opera. I am glad I "discovered" her recently on youtube and she is the best Norma ever. But she played no role for me in getting to like the opera. Maybe the problem was availability. I was born in 1976 (now you know ;-) ) and in an Eastern European country. We did not have her recordings at home, nor do I remember seeing them in the stores, although there must have been some. But not many, I guess.
Like it or not, it is difficult to be recognized Internationally without the imprimatur of the Metropolitan Opera and/or a major recording contract. Zeani was not well reviewed at her 1966 debut (La Traviata) at the Metropolitan, a surprising development given her long experience in that role. She repeated that opera and then had one more role - on the tour - inMy own preference from that era is undoubtedly Virginia Zeani, although there are sadly too few recordings of her and I don't think she ever truly received the recognition that she deserved.
Manon Lescaut (Puccini).Which opera was your first, which made you like the genre ?
Also, do you have stories about operas which worked well for "recruiting" your friends or loved ones, otherwise new to opera ?
And finally, do you have a story about an opera, which renewed your interest after a longer period of time, when you did not care ?