at the risk of being banned, I just want to point out that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I'm Catholic and I dont believe God put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith.I agree.
Although there's no such thing as evil if evolution is true.
In that case, who DID put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith???at the risk of being banned, I just want to point out that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I'm Catholic and I dont believe God put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith.
just sayin...please go on with your debate
"Greatness is objectively overrated. Michael Haydn"As does anyone who's been on TC long enough ...
I should have named the thread Greatness is Overrated
the DINOUSAURS did, you silly goose!In that case, who DID put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith???
I won't be debating, as you said I'll get told off!at the risk of being banned, I just want to point out that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I'm Catholic and I dont believe God put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith.
just sayin...please go on with your debate
Just so you know...Kellogg's Frosted Flakes are GRRREAT!
That is an old but misguided argument that confuses cultural values with natural hierarchies. A society may need commonly-held cultural values to help bind it together, but those values are not hard-wired, permanent, inevitable and universal. That is why they differ so greatly in different societies and change over time. In modern society, there are profound differences in musical values and tastes, imo largely due to modern technology that allows easy immediate access to music from almost anywhere on Earth.Assessing and discussing the relative quality of things is a hardwired biological imperative courtesy of evolution, for navigating and making sense of the world. If you can't judge why the taste of berries is preferable to cow dung in a psychosis of misguided egalitarianism, you die.
To rage against to concept of greatness is to defy the reality of hierarchies in nature, which is what patterns out order and gives us salvation from chaos. Then it must be said: to not admire Beethoven as great is not merely tasteless, but anti-nature, anti-life... evil.
In China, Japan and South Korea apparently not...nearly two centuries have now passed since Beethoven's time, and some immersion in his culture and sound world is usually needed to fully appreciate his work.
Tonal music (which has been adopted in the vast majority of music as standard across the entire world) is based on natural hierarchies of pitch stability. A perfect cadence is as pleasant to the ear as sugar is sweet to the tongue. This is not a "cultural value", but a reality of physics and biological wiring. Music is a science! Compositions are not invented, they are discovered.That is an old but misguided argument that confuses cultural values with natural hierarchies. A society may need commonly-held cultural values to help bind it together, but those values are not hard-wired, permanent, inevitable and universal. That is why they differ so greatly in different societies and change over time. In modern society, there are profound differences in musical values and tastes, imo largely due to modern technology that allows easy immediate access to music from almost anywhere on Earth.
As I've mentioned in several earlier posts, researchers have been trying to demonstrate your thesis using a variety of methods for centuries, to no avail. No surprise there, as the contrary view is quite convincing. See, Morris Weitz, “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XV (1956), 27-35; Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religion (1938). As Wittgenstein famously put it, "You might think that Aesthetics is a science telling us what’s beautiful — almost too ridiculous for words. I suppose it ought to include also what sort of coffee tastes well."Tonal music (which has been adopted in the vast majority of music as standard across the entire world) is based on natural hierarchies of pitch stability. A perfect cadence is as pleasant to the ear as sugar is sweet to the tongue. This is not a "cultural value", but a reality of physics and biological wiring. Music is a science! Compositions are not invented, they are discovered.
Nonsense. Ethical behavior and systems are to a significant extent products of evolution. They are adaptations with survival value for social species, including some non-human species.Although there's no such thing as evil if evolution is true.
Musicians in and from Asia have been immersing themselves in Beethoven's culture and sound world for many decades. I met and taught many who had been immersed since birth and were fluent speakers and writers of that musical language.In China, Japan and South Korea apparently not.
What does my post have to do with universal aesthetics? Nothing. You do not prove the validity of scientific principles by looking around and into the past and seeing if those principles were universally agreed upon by all cultures! Nonsense. Quite the opposite. Historically, cultures have been dramatically wrong about practically everything. The principles of science are universal regardless of the nonsense the many cultures of the world coughed up to attempt to explain reality. It is wrong to think Beethoven didn't touch on the universal because other cultures produced a large quantity of music unlike (and worse than) Beethoven's. Those cultures were ignorant, less mature... less sophisticated.As I've mentioned in several earlier posts, researchers have been trying to demonstrate your thesis using a variety of methods for centuries, to no avail. No surprise there, as the contrary view is quite convincing. See, Morris Weitz, “The Role of Theory in Aesthetics,” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, XV (1956), 27-35; Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religion (1938). As Wittgenstein famously put it, "You might think that Aesthetics is a science telling us what’s beautiful — almost too ridiculous for words. I suppose it ought to include also what sort of coffee tastes well."
Recently, researchers have tried to demonstrate the proposition that all music is based on universal principles using statistical studies. But that research has been inconclusive, if not supportive of the opposite conclusion. See Maris Fessenden, Why Music Is Not a Universal Language, Smithsonian, February 18, 2018: Why Music Is Not a Universal Language
More generally, many writers on the subject of aesthetics continue to try to chip away at the ideas of Weitz and Wittgenstein in this context various ways, and that is fair enough. But as far as I know they have yet to succeed.
In THIS case it is the Canon in D that has mass appeal because it's great.Just because something has mass appeal, doesn't make it great. What makes something SPECIAL is what moves on on a personal level, despite popularity.
My wife and I used to be the regular accompanist and song leader at a liberal church. This often meant we were also the soloists, and one time we sang the song Charlie (about Charles Darwin) by Chumbawumba. My wife wrote an additional very clever verse to bring the song 'round full circle:at the risk of being banned, I just want to point out that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I'm Catholic and I dont believe God put the dinosaur bones in the ground to test our faith.
just sayin...please go on with your debate
From everything I’ve read and heard from Asian musicians themselves, something comparable to ‘immersion in his (Beethoven’s) culture’ is not necessary ‘to fully understand his work’. The music itself resonated without some kind of need for familiarity with the western European culture. The seeds of classical music in China were to some extent ‘planted’ by Jewish violin-playing refugees (apparently starting in Shanghai) and people were slowly drawn to for a few decades after WW2. However, that was stalled during the years of the Cultural Revolution until the mid seventies. Thereafter, classical music, over the years, became surprisingly popular to this day...Musicians in and from Asia have been immersing themselves in Beethoven's culture and sound world for many decades. I met and taught many who had been immersed since birth and were fluent speakers and writers of that musical language.