Classical Music Forum banner

Best rendition of "Always" - Choose up to two selections...

  • Pat Boone

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bing Crosby and Eugenie Baird

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Bobby Darin

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other...

    Votes: 0 0.0%
1 - 3 of 22 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,272 Posts
Love the variety,
Boone bores me. and Patinkin as ever bamboozles me. I can't imagine a whole concert of him doing that, but I have a friend who swears his London gigs about 15(?) years ago were the best things he's seen

Perhaps for the obvious reason, I can relate to this this song when its sung slow and simple. :censored:

Frank yes indeed. Patsy Cline was the surprise package here. But the honky tonk piano and simple repeating bass guitar did make it to similar to her normal sound, with them removed it might have got my vote. But..

My Dad surprised us, in the only known time of him buying theatre tickets, for my 23rd birthday we saw Ella Fitzgerald at the London Palladium. Her accompanist that night was Oscar Petersen. Since then I've had a hot/cold feeling for her music. An immense talent and I've learnt so much from the songbooks; but too often she completely fails to get the meaning of the song and move me. She could sing the telephone book and it would likely sound like a contender for the great american songbook!

Occasionally and mostly in slower nos where she has no need to augment or "show off" she moves me. Like Woodduck I don't think the introduction of the band adds anything here, but its a beautiful performance. One vote.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,272 Posts
I know this will be behind a paywall for some, but in a NY Times op ed piece dated today, John McWhorter compared musicals to opera. Musicals come out rather well.
Interesting thank you. (I was informed I'd reached my free limit but was able to read it by scrolling down a Preview box to the side).

Really he's just saying he gets the value in musicals and they shouldn't be dismissed. After all its just opinion. I agree and think it needs saying. I've mentioned before that I long ago moved away from my peer group in musical tastes. Several later 'got' (at least some) Opera but they remain uninterested or even dismissive of musical theatre.

I love 'only make believe ' but is it really the equal of 'la chi darem'? Just shows the difficulty in justifying opinions. I'm not 'musically educated ' but to these ears the later is sublime with little to equal it as a piece of musical theatre. Perhaps he just picked a poor comparison.

I did like him arguing for Operetta the truly unfashionable form of music theatre. And he made a good point about the composers of Opera also being the orchestrator; but could have gone further, surely it's a necessity in a through composed piece? Through composing puts different requirements on ALL the music and leads to the primacy of the composer over the book writer and the lyricist. Interestingly there's 4 jobs in musicals (book, music, lyrics and arranger) and only two in Opera. There's more to be said.

An area where I think Musicals have a theatrical advantage is incorporating dance. Not just because of choreographers using ballet in a more interesting and integral way but there's more opportunities because the actors are dance trained. Can Opera offer us a moment like Shall we dance?

For me, the two (three?) forms sit happily together. I'm delighted he mentions Candide, a personal favourite, where the two(and a half😉) COLLIDE!
 
1 - 3 of 22 Posts
Top