Classical Music Forum banner

Vocal recitals.

68118 Views 339 Replies 27 Participants Last post by  Tsaraslondon
We don't seem to have anywhere on the site to discuss vocal recitals, so I thought I'd start one.

I'm returning to this box set at the moment.



This 5 disc set brings together most, though not all, of the recordings Dame Janet Baker made for Decca, Argo and Philips during the 1960s and 1970s. Though contracted to EMI (and Warner have a pretty exhaustive ten disc box set of her work for that label, called The Great Recordings), she made a few recordings for Decca/Argo (including her famous recording of Dido and Aeneas) in the early 60s, and then a tranche of recitals for Philips in the 1970s. The range of material here is not quite as wide as that on the aforementioned Warner, but takes us from 17th century arie through to Britten.

Disc 1 is a selection of what most vocal students would know as Arie Antiche (called here Arie Amorose), (in somewhat souped- up arrangements) by the Academy of St Martin in the Fields under Sir Neville Marriner. Whilst the arrangements can sound somewhat anachronistic today, Baker's wonderfully varied singing is not and each little song emerges as a little gem. The disc is rounded off with a couple of arias from La Calisto recorded shortly after her great success in the role of Diana/Jove at Glyndebourne.

Some of Baker's greatest early successes were in Handel and Disc 2 is mostly taken up by a superb 1972 Handel recital she made with the English Chamber Orchestra under Raymond Leppard. How brilliantly she charts the changing emotions in the cantata Lucrezia and also in the arioso-like Where shall I fly from Hercules,but each track displays the specificity of her art, the way she can express the despair in an aria like Scherza infida and the joy in Dopo notte. The disc is rounded off by a 1966 recording of Bach's Vergnügte Ruh and her incomparable When I am laid in earth from her 1961 recording of Dido and Aeneas.

Disc 3 has excerpts from a 1973 Mozart/Haydn recital and a 1976 Beethoven/Schubert disc, both made with Raymond Leppard, with the addition of arias from her complete recordings of la Clemenza di Tito and Cosí fan tutte under Sir Colin Davis. The two Haydn cantatas (one with piano and one with orchestra) are very welcome, but we do miss her stunning performance of Sesto's two big arias from La Clemenza di Tito, and her gently intimate performance of Mozart's Abendempfindung. Fortunately these have been included in a superb selection taken from the same two recitals on the Pentatone label, which includes all the missing Mozart and Schubert items. This disc also includes her recording of Beethoven's Ah perfido!, a little smaller in scale than some, but beautifully judged none the less. It doesn't have Callas's ferocity, it is true, but it is much more comfortably vocalised.

Disc 4 is of music by Rameau (excerpts from her 1965 recording of Hippolyte et Aricie, which well display her impassioned Phèdre), Gluck (arias for Orfeo and Alceste taken from her 1975 Gluck recital) and Berlioz (1979 performances of Cléopâtre and Herminie and Béatrice's big scene from Davis's complete 1977 recording of Béatrice et Bénédict). The biggest loss here is of the majority of the Gluck recital, which included many rare items, though the complete reictal was at one time available on one of Philips's budget labels. Baker is without doubt one of the greatest Berlioz exponents of all time, and the two scènes lyriques are especially welcome, the range of expression in both fully exploited.

Disc 5 is of late nineteenth and twentieth century French song and Benjamin Britten; the whole of a disc of French song made with the Melos Ensmble in 1966, excerpts from the composers own recordings of The Rape of Lucretia and Owen Wingraveand Phaedra, which was composed specifically for her. The Melos disc includes Ravel's Chansons Madécasses and Trois poèmes de Stéphane Mallarmé, Chausson's Chanson perpétuelle and Delage's Quatre poèmes hindous and is a fine example of Baker's felicity in French chanson. The Britten excerpts remind us of her sympathetic portrayal of Lucretia and her unpleasant Kate in Owen Wingrave. The Britten cantata is a great example of her controlled intensity.

Remarkable throughout is the care and concentration of her interpretations. Nothing is glossed over, nothing taken for granted, and she was one of those artists who could bring the frisson of live performance into the studio. Nor do I think she ever made a bad record. One of my all time favourite singers.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
281 - 300 of 340 Posts
I want to bring to your attention this operatic recital by Rachel Willis-Sørensen published a year ago or so by Sony Classical. Please not be distracted by the marketing pastel tones and the title of the recital. Ms. Willis-Sørensen is actually a serious singer who knows what she is doing. She has sung all roles presented on stage. She is 38 years old and seems to have her head well screwed in her shoulders, as it were.

Ms. Willis-Sørensen is a juicy lyric soprano with a wide vocal range (she can sing up to high Eb), a darkish sound and a largish voice (more on that later). She demonstrates good musicality, a good trill, a good legato, and the ability to execute coloratura effectively but more importantly as part of the musical presentation of a role. It is not a vocal exercise as it clearly has in her singing a musical and dramatic purpose. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has another important aspect in her singing to my taste: she is capable of marry her tone and her legato to she give propulsion to her singing, a purpose and forward direction instead of each tone sitting on itself. Few singers have had this ability, it makes for singing of consequence.

Hair Nose Face Cheek Skin


Because she has a well developed voice — I am sure that many will find quips and issues, I don't say that she is perfect — her lyric voice has a well developed heft and projection resulting in a volume that would tempt people to think that she is a dramatic soprano. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has been pushed to sing heavier Wagner roles (e.g., Sieglinde; she has Elsa and Eva in her repertory) but fortunately, she has resisted going into that direction, however, tempting it may be. She understands who she is vocally, she wants to remain with Mozart, and perhaps explore the bel canto repertory.

This was an exciting discovery. This year they have published her recording of Strauss' Vier letzte Lieder and the closing scene of Capriccio with Andris Nelson and the Gewandhausorchester Leipzig. I was impressed with that recording also.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I want to bring to your attention this operatic recital by Rachel Willis-Sørensen published a year ago or so by Sony Classical. Please not be distracted by the marketing pastel tones and the title of the recital. Ms. Willis-Sørensen is actually a serious singer who knows what she is doing. She has sung all roles presented on stage. She is 38 years old and seems to have her head well screwed in her shoulders, as it were.

Ms. Willis-Sørensen is a juicy lyric soprano with a wide vocal range (she can sing up to high Eb), a darkish sound and a largish voice (more on that later). She demonstrates good musicality, a good trill, a good legato, and the ability to execute coloratura effectively but more importantly as part of the musical presentation of a role. It is not a vocal exercise as it clearly has in her singing a musical and dramatic purpose. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has another important aspect in her singing to my taste: she is capable of marry her tone and her legato to she give propulsion to her singing, a purpose and forward direction instead of each tone sitting on itself. Few singers have had this ability, it makes for singing of consequence.

View attachment 188098

Because she has a well developed voice — I am sure that many will find quips and issues, I don't say that she is perfect — her lyric voice has a well developed heft and projection resulting in a volume that would tempt people to think that she is a dramatic soprano. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has been pushed to sing heavier Wagner roles (e.g., Sieglinde; she has Elsa and Eva in her repertory) but fortunately, she has resisted going into that direction, however, tempting it may be. She understands who she is vocally, she wants to remain with Mozart, and perhaps explore the bel canto repertory.

This was an exciting discovery. This year they have published her recording of Strauss' Vier letzte Lieder and the closing scene of Capriccio with Andris Nelson and the Gewandhausorchester Leipzig. I was impressed with that recording also.
A certain Mr. Moore was not so impressed with this:
A certain Mr. Moore was not so impressed with this:
I note that she lost out to Kate Royal in her round of the Song to the Moon competiton, though @Woodduck liked her. I was bothered by the tendency for the voice to spread, and I see @MAS was too. She obviously polarises opinion.
  • Like
Reactions: 1


This one is making for the jettison pile, I'm afraid. Crespin's singing is always tasteful and musical, but, for me, there is too much French sang froid to the singing, both in Verdi and Wagner and Prêtre's conducting is a hindrance rather than a help. Maybe it was my mood, but my impressions were even less favourable on this occasion than when I last revieved it for my blog. Here's the link, if you'r e interested. Régine Crespin – Opera Arias
See less See more
I note that she lost out to Kate Royal in her round of the Song to the Moon competiton, though @Woodduck liked her. I was bothered by the tendency for the voice to spread, and I see @MAS was too. She obviously polarises opinion.
Which makes for an interesting singer... ;)
I did a couple of passes on the recital and started to hear beyond the imperfections and understand her idiom. Her singing is not run-of-the-mill conservatory and faceless. I hope you give the recital a listen and “make friends” to her sound. I found it rewarding.
  • Helpful
Reactions: 1
Ms. Willis-Sørensen is a juicy lyric soprano with a wide vocal range (she can sing up to high Eb), a darkish sound and a largish voice (more on that later). She demonstrates good musicality, a good trill, a good legato, and the ability to execute coloratura effectively but more importantly as part of the musical presentation of a role. It is not a vocal exercise as it clearly has in her singing a musical and dramatic purpose. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has another important aspect in her singing to my taste: she is capable of marry her tone and her legato to she give propulsion to her singing, a purpose and forward direction instead of each tone sitting on itself. Few singers have had this ability, it makes for singing of consequence.

View attachment 188098

Because she has a well developed voice — I am sure that many will find quips and issues, I don't say that she is perfect — her lyric voice has a well developed heft and projection resulting in a volume that would tempt people to think that she is a dramatic soprano. Ms. Willis-Sørensen has been pushed to sing heavier Wagner roles (e.g., Sieglinde; she has Elsa and Eva in her repertory) but fortunately, she has resisted going into that direction, however, tempting it may be. She understands who she is vocally, she wants to remain with Mozart, and perhaps explore the bel canto repertory.

This was an exciting discovery. This year they have published her recording of Strauss' Vier letzte Lieder and the closing scene of Capriccio with Andris Nelson and the Gewandhausorchester Leipzig. I was impressed with that recording also.
We can sample her Four Last Songs on YouTube:


I was greatly impressed by her deeply felt and detailed interpretation of Rusalka's aria, but I'm less impressed with her singing in a few other things I've sampled. I really like her warm, rich timbre, which reminds me a bit of Eileen Farrell - she's not just another anonymous soprano - and she has good musical instincts. But, like @Tsaraslondon, I'm a little bothered by what seems to be a spreading vibrato, which is particularly unwelcome in the Strauss. In this respect she does seem just another modern singer, and she's probably destined to join the ranks of the wobblers.
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 3


I know countertenors don't get much love on this site, and, until I heard Daniels (the first time, it was live) I had never much liked them myself. But Daniels greatly impressed me. By any yardstick, this is surely a voice of great beauty. HIs virtuosity in fast moving music is not in doubt (please note, no aspirates), but what impressed me most was his musicality and his emotional connection with Handel's more heartfelt pieces.

I think this was his first recital disc, and there are a few occasions when his dips into his rather baritonal chest voice are faintly reminiscent of Dame Hilda Bracket (look up Hinge and Bracket if you don't know who she was), but this is wonderful singing.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1


In his second solo recital, Daniels adds early Mozart and Gluck to the mix. By this time, he has slightly tempered the baritonal chest register and, though low notes are still firm and rich, they are much better integrated into the rest of the voice. Listening to such wonderful music making, I still find it hard to understand objections to the countertenor voice. There is absolutely nothing hooty about his tone, his legato line and breath control is excellent and his virtuosity quite exceptional. He is just a very fine singer. The range he sings in shouldn't make any difference to appreciating his fine qualities.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
We can sample her Four Last Songs on YouTube:


I was greatly impressed by her deeply felt and detailed interpretation of Rusalka's aria, but I'm less impressed with her singing in a few other things I've sampled. I really like her warm, rich timbre, which reminds me a bit of Eileen Farrell - she's not just another anonymous soprano - and she has good musical instincts. But, like @Tsaraslondon, I'm a little bothered by what seems to be a spreading vibrato, which is particularly unwelcome in the Strauss. In this respect she does seem just another modern singer, and she's probably destined to join the ranks of the wobblers.
I hear the spreading and she could be destined to the pile of wobblers. However, she put a stop to her being pushed into the spinto roles and went back to the Mimís, Donna Annas, etc. I hope she continues to work on steadying her vocal production and push less at the top and let it bloom. The pushing becomes part of the automatic vocal production and unlearning the muscle memory actions takes some time. As you say, @Woodduck, I think she offers good musical instincts and less generalized singing than other current singers.

P.S.: Fleming was also being pushed in that direction many years ago. I remember an Avery Fischer hall Pavarotti and Friends concert in the early-mid nineties where she was sounding very dark. Then, in a Faust broadcast from the Met where she was singing Marguerite (gloriously, BTW), she announced in an interview feature that these would be her last Fausts because “she wanted to last a few more years”.
  • Like
Reactions: 1


In his second solo recital, Daniels adds early Mozart and Gluck to the mix. By this time, he has slightly tempered the baritonal chest register and, though low notes are still firm and rich, they are much better integrated into the rest of the voice. Listening to such wonderful music making, I still find it hard to understand objections to the countertenor voice. There is absolutely nothing hooty about his tone, his legato line and breath control is excellent and his virtuosity quite exceptional. He is just a very fine singer. The range he sings in shouldn't make any difference to appreciating his fine qualities.
I hear what you say, however, I am allergic to the countertenor sound. It is very simple: I don't like it. I have tried to rationalize the musical values, etc. etc. but can't get over the basic sound. It's it not unlike when we dislike a particular soprano or tenor voice. For example, I never warmed up a famous tenor of yore sound. No matter how well he sang, his basic sound spoiled the performance. ;)
I hear what you say, however, I am allergic to the countertenor sound. It is very simple: I don't like it. I have tried to rationalize the musical values, etc. etc. but can't get over the basic sound. It's it not unlike when we dislike a particular soprano or tenor voice. For example, I never warmed up a famous tenor of yore sound. No matter how well he sang, his basic sound spoiled the performance. ;)
I was too, until I heard him in recital at the Barbican in London. A friend of mine more or less dragged me along. He completely won me over, and I have been a fan ever since.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I was too, until I heard him in recital at the Barbican in London. A friend of mine more or less dragged me along. He completely won me over, and I have been a fan ever since.
Then, the only solution is the you travel here and drag me kicking and screaming into a countertenor performance! Do you see another alternative? 😀
  • Haha
Reactions: 1
Then, the only solution is the you travel here and drag me kicking and screaming into a countertenor performance! Do you see another alternative? 😀
Unfortunately I don't think Daniels is performing anymore and no other countertenor has had quite the same effect on me. I really do think it that has more to do with the artist than the voice.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Unfortunately I don't think Daniels is performing anymore and no other countertenor has had quite the same effect on me. I really do think it that has more to do with the artist than the voice.
No, he isn’t. Some imbroglio that has distracted him from music.
No, he isn’t. Some imbroglio that has distracted him from music.
It would distract anybody. Innocent until proven guilty doesn't seem to apply in this case. PRESS — DAVID DANIELS | countertenor


In his second solo recital, Daniels adds early Mozart and Gluck to the mix. By this time, he has slightly tempered the baritonal chest register and, though low notes are still firm and rich, they are much better integrated into the rest of the voice. Listening to such wonderful music making, I still find it hard to understand objections to the countertenor voice. There is absolutely nothing hooty about his tone, his legato line and breath control is excellent and his virtuosity quite exceptional. He is just a very fine singer. The range he sings in shouldn't make any difference to appreciating his fine qualities.
I'm not generally averse to a good countertenor, but I'm not a huge fan of Daniels. I saw him early in his career as Arsemenes in Xerxes (opposite Lorraine Hunt Lieberson in the title role and enjoyed his performance. But when I listen to his recordings, I can't help thinking that I'm listening to a third-rate mezzo.
I'm not generally averse to a good countertenor, but I'm not a huge fan of Daniels. I saw him early in his career as Arsemenes in Xerxes (opposite Lorraine Hunt Lieberson in the title role and enjoyed his performance. But when I listen to his recordings, I can't help thinking that I'm listening to a third-rate mezzo.
Well and truly staggered. But then there’s another singer we disagree on.

I’ve heard Daniels live on many occasions and he was wonderful on all occasions. His legato is superb and better than a lot of mezzos I know. His facility in fast moving music is superb (with no aspirates). Musicality and emotional connection with what he’s singing, also superb. As far as I’m concerned, he is a very fine singer, regardless of what range he happens to be singing in.

You are entitled to your opinion, of course. ;)
  • Like
Reactions: 1


This is a reissue of a 1955 operatic recital, plus some early 78s and Adieu notre petite table from the Monteux Manon. We hear her here in some roles she would never sing on stage (Margherita, Elvira, Wally and Santuzza, though she would go on to record the whole role) as well as some (Manon, Marguerite and Mimi) with which she became particularly associated. She was also a wonderful Desdemona and I always regret that she didn't sing the role on the Serafin recording with Vickers and Gobbi. The performance of the Willow Song and Ave Maria is one of the highlights of the disc.

This is a lovely collection, which exploits her capacity for sweetness, charm and plaintiveness, with the voice at its warmest.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2


Try as I might, I never find Dessay as interesting on record as I do in the flesh. The voice is just not that interesting and more than once I wished I were listening to the lovely Valerie Masterson, who, as far as I'm concerned, was the perfect Cleopatra, both vocally and visually.

Maybe it was my mood, but, despite the interesting programme, this didn't really hold my attention. One for the jettison pile, I think.
See less See more


I found this a much more enjoyable listening experience than the Dessay Cleopatra disc I was listening to earlier. Is it the fact that we get two voices, the more varied programme or the somewhat more lively conducting of Alan Curtis? Who can say? Anyway, it's a keeper.
See less See more
281 - 300 of 340 Posts
Top