The consensus is probably that no.24 with its great variations movement is the finest. After that I’d go for 27 and 23So far I have only listened to Mozart PC #20 but I’m excited to try more
The consensus is probably that no.24 with its great variations movement is the finest. After that I’d go for 27 and 23So far I have only listened to Mozart PC #20 but I’m excited to try more
Also try 17.The consensus is probably that no.24 with its great variations movement is the finest. After that I’d go for 27 and 23
Yes, no. 17 is my favorite Mozart piano concerto. Other favorites are nos. 9/19/20/24.Also try 17.
Both the Missa solemnis and the 9th have passages where one might wonder if Beethoven was in fact impaired by his deafness because of the extreme vocal demands (although he did this for instruments long before and also in Fidelio when he could still hear well) and the density of combined orchestral/vocal forces that makes it almost impossible to hear half what is going on and tends to overwhelm the listener (and I think the Missa is "worse" in the last respect). BUT they have also passages that are among the most refined, colorful and sublime in sheer sound in all Beethoven, such as the Benedictus with the violin solo, so this seems to show that he was not really impaired.But a few years ago I began really listening to Beethoven's Missa Solemnis, and and have come to realize that it is probably one of the most beautiful compositions ever written. What a supreme masterpiece. It's funny, people always point out that Beethoven was deaf when he wrote his 9th, but, for me, the 9th, although great, just isn't in the same league as his Missa Solemnis, and he was deaf when he wrote it! There are so many sublime moments. And the chorus is instructed to "shout" at the end of the Gloria!
I remember only that either 17 or 18 was very fine— probably was 17 thenYes, no. 17 is my favorite Mozart piano concerto. Other favorites are nos. 9/19/20/24.
They are both very good, but 17 K 453 is considerably and maybe justifiedly more famous; it figures in one of Bernstein's talks or essays (and I think he recorded only this one and #15 K 450).I remember only that either 17 or 18 was very fine— probably was 17 then
This might be sacrilege, but while I do love the Clarinet Quintet, there are numerous other Brahms chamber works I find myself returning to more frequently, including all of the other clarinet pieces (the op. 120 sonatas and the op. 114 trio). But that said, Brahms's chamber works probably account for about a quarter of my classical listening these days, so it's a high barBrahms' Clarinet Quintet
Can anyone explain why some of Beethoven’s compositions, especially his later works such as certain piano sonatas and string quartets are only referred to by their opus number? I don’t see that happening as frequently with any other composer except maybe Mozart. But isn’t it easier to remember something as piano sonata no. 32?The zero-thinking, gun-to-my-head choice is Beethoven Op. 111. It even has an aesthetically pleasing opus number.
I love the sharpness and precision of Boulez/Zimerman which is definitely my go-to recording. However, t I wouldn't want to go without Fischer/Schiff or Fricsay/Anda either. The piece is a tough nut to crack for the performes, so I suggest listening to verious recordings in order to hear different sides of it!What is your favourite recording, or one you recommend I listen to. Your description makes me want to hear it.
The G minor one? I love that one too, on the piano.Bach's little fugue
For many/most people it is in fact easier to use opus numbers for Beethoven and K numbers for Mozart. It's mostly convention and habit but it also adds a bit of information, i.e. roughly the neighborhood of pieces in other genres like op.53 Waldstein sonata, op.54 piano sonata, op.55 Eroica symphony, op. 56 triple concerto, op.57 Appassionata sonata, op.58 piano concerto #4, op.59-1-3 Razumovsky quartets etc.Can anyone explain why some of Beethoven’s compositions, especially his later works such as certain piano sonatas and string quartets are only referred to by their opus number? I don’t see that happening as frequently with any other composer except maybe Mozart. But isn’t it easier to remember something as piano sonata no. 32?