Maybe not. Here's what I wrote about it a few years ago on an Amazon review:I only listened to it once so far, but I was underwhelmed by Klemperer's version. I usually regard Otto's sacred works in the top echelon. Perhaps a few more listens will yield more.
Weighted down with Klemperer's leaden tempi, the whole thing sounds a museum piece. Best it stays there is a relic of a bygone age. If you want an all bells and whistles approach go to Beecham - at least that is fun!Maybe not. Here's what I wrote about it a few years ago on an Amazon review:
"This is a very dark and serious recording of this work. The tempi are a little slower than I'd like, but are not really excessive. The chorus is fine, but the soloists are a pretty unimpressive lot, despite the names. I like Grace Hoffman best of the four - the voice is a bit over-vibrant for this music, but at least her English is idiomatic. So is Jerome Hines', but his delivery is stiff and metronomic. Gedda is simply out of his element here - the voice is nasal in quality and his English sounds phonetic. Schwarzkopf's a little better in that respect, but I simply can't stand the sound of her voice."
Crass is fabulous on the German Richter recording. The language doesn't bother me; one of my favorites is this one, currently selling for virtually nothing on US Amazon:I listened to Karl Richter's 1972 recording with the London Philharmonic (in English) this afternoon. The 1964 recording with Richter's own Münchener Bach-Orchester und Chor is sung in German, as others have noted here. It's a monumental-sounding recording; I'm not a huge Messiah fan but I imagine that this is a different direction than a historically-informed interpretation would choose to pursue. The 1964 recording looks better on paper but I haven't heard it; the fact that it is performed in translation might ruffle some feathers, too.