Classical Music Forum banner

19th Century Masterpieces: Part Six - Debussy's Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune

2 reading
2.3K views 14 replies 10 participants last post by  Fruity Felix  
#1 ·
19th Century Masterpieces: Part Six - Debussy's Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune

Image

Image


Claude Debussy came of age as a composer during a particularly rich period in French cultural history. Around 1887, the 25-year-old composer began attending the now legendary Tuesday evening soirées at the apartment of his friend the Symbolist poet Stéphane Mallarmé. Regular guests included the sculptor Rodin, the Impressionist painter Claude Monet, the poets Paul Verlaine and Paul Valéry, and writers like André Gide and Marcel Proust. These associations had a lasting influence on Debussy’s music. His works were very much shaped by the innovations in visual arts and literature of the time—a period when formal structure took a back seat to mood, atmosphere, and color.

It was perhaps Mallarmé himself who exercised the greatest influence on his young protégé. Debussy was quite taken with Mallarmé’s Afternoon of a Faun, a dreamy epic poem written in 1876, inspired by a pastoral play entitled Diane of the Forest by Theodore de Banville. The elaborately constructed poem itself is a rhapsodic monologue from the point of view of a faun, that half-man, half-goat creature from mythology. In a Mediterranean valley of yore, the faun awakens from a nap in the forest on a sunlit afternoon. He tries desperately to remember a dream—or was it a real encounter?—with a pair of amorous nymphs. As the afternoon grows warmer, the faun becomes drowsier, and finally drops off to sleep, hoping to meet his elusive consorts in his dreams.

In the complex structure of Mallarmé’s poem, “an extreme sensuality, an extreme intellectuality, and an extreme musicality are combined, intermingled, and opposed,” as fellow poet Paul Valéry put it. Mallarmé’s philosophy was to suggest rather than to name objects. The hazy ambiguity of the poet’s words is magically mirrored in the fluid rhythms and tonal ambiguities of Debussy’s Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune, composed during the years 1892–94. In describing the Prélude as a very free illustration of Mallarmé’s poem, Debussy said that his music sought to evoke “the successive scenes in which the longings and the desires of the faun pass in the heat of the afternoon.”

As the piece opens, the faun’s flute softly intones the languorously syncopated principal motif, consisting of scalewise passages, chromaticized within the range of three whole tones. Muted horns and soft harp glissandos answer. The emphasis is on the tritone, that most ambiguous of intervals. All these elements play a part in re-creating the dream-like atmosphere of Mallarmé’s poem. The principal theme then passes through various instrumental colors while tremolando strings create a backdrop of slumbrous noontime haze.

After a second and third subject are introduced by the woodwinds, the piece slowly builds to a climax. The first theme then returns, more languorous than ever. Eventually, a solo cello, then an oboe, join the flute, as horns, violins, and woodwinds weave an enchanted close, colored by repeated phrases for harp and the bell-like tone of antique cymbals, punctuated by a pair of low, whispering pizzicato strokes.

This quietly sensual score sparked a musical revolution when it appeared more than a century, on December 22, 1894, at a National Society of Music concert in Paris. Every aspect of this exquisitely wrought music of fragile beauty went against every 19th-century trend in music, from Beethoven to Wagner. A new fluidity of form was one of Debussy’s great contributions to modern music. In addition, the significant role that Debussy granted to instrumental color in his Prélude set it apart from all previous orchestral scores. As Pierre Boulez aptly noted, “The flute of Debussy’s Faune breathed new air into the art of music.”

[Article taken from the LA Philharmonic's website]
 
#2 ·
Boulez cited it as the beginning of modern music, and who am I to disagree?

I remember when I first heard this piece. I was about 30 and only just branching out from Beethoven, Mozart Wagner and others (I came late to CM). I arrived home from the Oxford Street HMV record shop with an armful of new CDs, including a Naxos Debussy collection. I’m not even going to try to put into words the magic this music weaved over me. I’d never heard anything like it and still haven’t since.
 
#3 · (Edited)
Boulez cited it as the beginning of modern music, and who am I to disagree?

I remember when I first heard this piece. I was about 30 and only just branching out from Beethoven, Mozart Wagner and others (I came late to CM). I arrived home from the Oxford Street HMV record shop with an armful of new CDs, including a Naxos Debussy collection. I’m not even going to try to put into words the magic this music weaved over me. I’d never heard anything like it and still haven’t since.
I wouldn't disagree with Boulez in that I feel that the last say 20 years of the 19th Century saw some incredible change happening in music.

Debussy is in my 'Top 5' favorite composers and two framed photographs of him adorn my walls in my room. Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune is one of those works that I could listen to multiple times in a row and come away each time with a newfound love for the piece. One of the surprising aspects of this work when I was really getting to know it via listening and reading is that it is actually meticulously scored. When I started to seriously research Debussy, I was surprised to find out that every single measure was carefully thought out, which to me belies what I'm actually hearing when I listen to his music. The free-flowing, ebb-and-flow of his writing sounds like pure stream-of-consciousness. All of his music sounds like it came from some other realm entirely --- a dream-world. The first-time I heard this work, I simply could not believe what I was hearing and I still feel this way today.
 
#4 ·
Just saw this live last week along with the Prokofiev 5th...the Debussy stole the show. What a magnificent short little piece it is, but so powerful and beautiful. Bernstein did a wonderful talk about it during one of his lectures - worth a listen, if you haven't heard it.


My other favorite fact about this - Debussy wrote 110 measures in the piece, to match the 110 lines in the original poem.
 
#9 ·
There is just so much to say about this masterpiece, there is not enough space in a discussion forum.

I think some others have covered the importance of the tritone, at least melodically. It is everywhere harmonically as well.

Bars 4 through 11 are incredible. Bar 4 the flute melody cadences on a Bb which is a tritone away from the tonic of the key, and it coincides with the entrance of an accompanying "Tristan chord" (copyright Wagner) spelled as A# C# E G#. A gorgeous chord. So the Bb is a chord tone. This chord, like in Tristan, is beautiful but tense and "resolves" similarly like the appoggiatura in Tristan. But the resolution is different than in Wagner and totally genius just like Richard. The Bb and Ab are common tones held over. The E resolves up to F and the C# resolves up to D. But the destination chord is a dominant seventh! Bb7! Yet, it sounds resolved. So wonderful. It is because he has used traditional principles of voice-leading. And Debussy is exploiting tritones here again. The E and Bb in the Tristan chord. And the D and Ab in the Bb7 chord.

Notice on the repeat that Debussy "goes to 11" (Spinal Tap) by pushing the voice-leading and resolution even further and pushing us over the edge by the horn going from the resolved D (concert pitch) to E, then F (a new point of resolution), BUT(!!!), that F is now a Beethovenian leading tone to the F#(!!!) of the next D Major seven chord!!! With now the SAME melody that was in E MAJOR (!!!) before!

I could continue on from there (bar 11), but I don't have hours and hours. It would take a 200 page book to cover everything in detail. Although it is worth mentioning the overall absence of traditional chords and progressions. Take where we left off, bar 11. The new "tonic" of D Major 7 goes to G dominant 7. Totally believable with that super-smooth voice leading and chromatic melody. Take note of how many times he uses that SAME melody with the same pitches but it's in a different chord progression /"key" (such as bar 21, and bar 26). I mean, I've heard of re-harmonizing in the SAME key, but the same notes in a completely different key is so hip.

Of great note too, is the novel use of the whole-tone scale. Debussy assigned the WTS a specific formal function in this piece that is extremely instructive and useful, especially when writing non-functional music. Check out bars 31-36, 48-50 (to a lesser extent 58 and 92). In bar 30 the first section of music came to a very satisfying cadence in B Major (the dominant key of the piece). Then bar 31 (approached by stepwise motion) through 36 the music is free in the WTS (the orchestra is all WTS, the clarinet has some quick chromatic passing notes in its whole tone passage melody). Then the next big section starts at bar 37 with pentatonic melodic passages over lush chords. So, the whole tone material is used as a transition. He went from two varied large sections via the whole tone scale. This is a remarkable lesson. The whole tone passage "cleansed the palette" so-to-speak with it's ambiguous nature. If he had transitioned with traditional methods, like the circle of fifths, it wouldn't have worked. He's got the chromatic scale on one end, and the pentatonic on the other, with varying keys and chords, etc. Plus he needs to stick with the tritone theme. The whole tone scale works like a glove.

Notice too, how he was able to make it work. Look at the end of bar 36. The C natural in the melody of the whole tone passage (beat 3) "resolves" like a leading tone to the C# of bar 37 (the new melody note of the new section). Not only that, but the Bb in the bass "resolves" to B natural in bar 37.

Note also the incredible climax at 63. The chord progression is repeated chords with roots a tritone away. Db Major 1 bar. G7 1 bar. Then repeats.

I better shut up.
 
#10 · (Edited)
In my view, "Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune" is one of the most original, seminal works in music history. The piece made an indelible impression on Maurice Ravel, who said it was a "unique marvel in the whole of music" and "the only 'perfect' piece of music ever composed." Ravel thought there was nothing in the history of music more beautiful than Debussy's Prelude, adding "I would like to have it played to me on my deathbed." Indeed Ravel liked the Prelude so much that he composed a piano 4-hand version of it, even though Debussy had already composed a version for two pianos:

--Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune (arranged by Maurice Ravel for piano 4 hands): played here by Jean-Pierre Armengaud & Olivier Chauzu:


.... I recently wrote the following two posts on another TC thread, where they went mostly unappreciated. I felt like I had wasted my time. Perhaps there will be more interest on this thread?, I hope:

Post #1 - My topic was whether it was justifiable to call Debussy an early modern composer:

"Early modernism more or less began in 1894 with his Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune:

“The flute of the faun brought new breath to the art of music”--Pierre Boulez.

To my mind, Debussy's Prelude a l'apres-midi d'un Faune is a masterpiece like no other. Maurice Ravel considered it the most unique, perfect piece of music ever composed, and wanted it to be played to him on his deathbed.

Jeux, Pelléas et Mélisande, La mer, String Quartet in G Minor, 12 Etudes, & Le martyre de Saint Sébastien were likewise enormously influential works.

Listeners today have become so accustomed to Debussy's innovations that they take them for granted, forgetting their source.

From Gramophone magazine (in July 2012),

"But the innovations of Debussy’s music, in matters of harmony, orchestration, texture and structure, were to have significant resonances throughout the 20th century and beyond, impacting on Stravinsky and Ravel among his slightly younger contemporaries and on such leading lights as Bartók, Webern, Messiaen, Dutilleux, Boulez and Takemitsu in the decades to come."

I'd add Koechlin, Roussel, Milhaud, Tournemire, N. Tcherepnin, Delius, Bax, Britten, Varese, Ligeti, Reich, Glass, Knussen, Saariaho, Hillborg, & Benjamin, & I could go on.

Plus, in Jazz, Debussy's piano music was hugely influential on Duke Ellington, Bill Evans, Miles Davis, etc..

While in the genre of chamber music, I believe that Debussy's late Sonata for Flute, Harp, & Viola is the single most original, brilliant, & widely influential chamber work of the 20th century & beyond.

Certainly Igor Stravinsky knew the truth, as he stated, "The musicians of my generation and I myself, owe the most to Debussy."

From Gramophone magazine, here are composer Oliver Knussen's thoughts on the subject,

"... Debussy’s impact on virtually all the music that followed him, as Oliver Knussen says, ‘is incalculable. The likelihood is that if a composer has not been influenced by such a figure, he has deliberately reacted against the aesthetic. I don’t think I have written a single note since I was 18 years old that doesn’t have Debussy hovering somewhere in the background,’ adding modestly, ‘though perhaps that’s just wishful thinking.’ "

Gramophone, July 2012: Debussy: Playing with Colour

I agree with Ravel, Stravinsky, Boulez, & Knussen, & see Debussy as the most important and seminal composer of the 20th century."

Post #2:

In response, Mandryka quoted from my post:
"Early modernism more or less began in 1894 with his Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune"
& asked, "Can you say a bit more about this? (I can see someone arguing for Jeux as a prototype of some formal ideas which became popular in the mid-century and after, possibly. And some piano music as exploring spectral ideas. But why Faune? Cool music though. )"

I responded as follows,

"Sure. As I wrote above, we've gotten so used to Debussy's innovations that they seem normal to us today. But that wasn't the case between 1894-1917. In regards to his orchestration of the Prelude, how many 'romantic' orchestral works prior to 1894 can you name that begin with a flute solo, whose opening melody is then variously taken up by the oboe, & then back to the flute, & then by two flutes, & then by the clarinet, etc.? All while using no percussion except for two crotales!

While the strings, for much of the piece, take a more or less secondary role in the orchestra; indeed there are sections where they simply pluck their strings in support of the solo woodwinds. In other words, Debussy is taking an almost 'anti-symphonic' outlook & is at least partly rejecting the "romantic" (& "classical") tradition of a 19th-century orchestra. He had, in effect, turned the usual dominant string emphasis in an orchestra upside down. Though to the modern ear it all sounds normal.

Debussy's exact orchestration here is for 3 flutes, 2 oboes, cor anglais, 2 clarinets, 2 bassoons, 4 horns, 2 harps, 2 crotales and strings. If you didn't know that & I were to play a guessing game with you, & tell you that I was thinking of a particular unnamed work & this was its orchestration, I seriously doubt you'd start guessing romantic era works. & if you didn't guess Debussy right away, I expect you'd start guessing that it was a modern work, maybe by Messiaen or Jolivet, or even Boulez?, or some composer like that, because it's an unusual orchestration for a score that was composed in 1894, but not at all unusual for the 20th century. So, I don't think that the influence of Debussy's emancipating orchestrations on later composers--even on his younger contemporaries like Schoenberg, Ravel, & Stravinsky--should be underestimated. It was considerable.


I also think that the tonal & harmonic mixing & blending of the flute, harp & viola in Debussy's equally influential & strikingly modern late 1915 Sonata for Flute, Harp & Viola has its origin or roots in the Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune, where Debussy placed a similar emphasis on two harps, the flute (& other woodwinds), and strings (predominantly the violins & violas). To my mind, the Sonata is, in effect, a sort of distillation of the 1894 Prelude. & of course the later influence of this unusual combination of instrumental timbres (or some equally exotic combination of instruments) was quite significant, inspiring composers such as Ravel, Koechlin, Ropartz, Roussel, Honegger, Cras, Milhaud, Bax, Britten, Hanson, Messiaen, etc., all the way to Knussen, Birtwistle, Boulez, Takemitsu, etc., in our own time. Indeed the list of modern & contemporary composers that have walked down the imaginative, innovative tonal & harmonic path that Debussy forged is a mile long.



I believe the works below are deeply indebted not only to Debussy's Sonata for Flute, Harp, & Viola, but also to the astonishing originality of his Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune:

--Roussel: Sérénade pour flûte, violon, alto, violoncelle et harpe, Op. 30
--Ropartz: Prélude, marine et chansons pour flûte, violon, violoncelle et harpe
--Ravel: Introduction et allegro pour harpe, avec accompagnement de quatuor à cordes, flûte et clarinette
--Koechlin: Quintette No. 2 pour flûte, violon, alto, violoncelle et harpe, Op. 223


--Honegger: Petite Suite for Flute, Viola, and Harp:

--Hanson: Serenade for Flute, Harp, and Strings, op. 35:
Serenade For Solo Flute, Harp And String Orchestra

--Takemitsu: "And Then I Knew 't Was Wind":
Takemitsu: And Then I Knew 't Was Wind

--Takemitsu: Toward the Sea III: Takemitsu: Toward the Sea III - 1. The Night

--Andrès: "Algues", 7 pieces for flute and harp: »Algues« 7 pieces for flute and harp / Antonia Schreiber, Alja Velkaverh / Gürzenich-Orchester

--Birtwistle: Fantasia upon all the notes for flute, clarinet, harp and string quartet: Harrison Birtwistle - Fantasia upon all the notes

--Birtwistle: Secret Theatre: Birtwistle: Secret Theatre

--Birtwistle: The Moth Requiem: The Moth Requiem

--Boulez: ...explosante-fixe... for flute with live-electronics, two flutes and ensemble:
Boulez: ...explosante fixe... / Pahud · Boulez · Berliner Philharmoniker

--Boulez: Le Marteau sans Maître, Cantata for Contralto, Flute, Viola, Guitar, Vibraphone, and Percussion: Pierre Boulez - Le Marteau sans Maître (Audio + Full Score)

Etc.

So yes, while listening to the Faun, I can't help but sense that Debussy is trying to break free of the then current academic constraints of tonality and harmonic function in a way that was unique for 1894.

Keeping that in mind, musician Timothy Judd writes,

"The dissonant interval of the augmented fourth (or tritone) is a persistent presence from the opening flute statement. This interval, which Leonard Bernstein called “the absolute negation of tonality,” opens the door to the whole tone scale, which floats into an exotic sound world which is neither major or minor."

If that isn't 'modern', what is? Indeed, Debussy's use of the whole tone scale was a major influence on Olivier Messiaen, for example.

thelistenersclub.com

Debussy's "Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun": Desires and Dreams:

Hence, there is no comparable work like it before 1894. Although in 1894 Debussy had yet to entirely break with the western rules of rhythm. Rhythmically, I don't think of the Faun as a modern work, despite that the rhythm flows much too freely for it to sound like a romantic era work. But he wasn't quite there yet. Debussy would need to hear a full gamelan orchestra in 1900, before he would begin to push the academic boundaries of rhythm in western music into a new direction: such as in his gamelan influenced "Pagodes" from the 1903 Estampes for solo piano, where the rhythms are distinctly non-western & daringly free and non-conforming:

--Estampes, L. 100 - 1. Pagodes · Zoltán Kocsis: Debussy: Estampes, L. 100 - 1. Pagodes

The content & subject matter of Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune isn't romantic either. At least, I don't see the symbolist poet Stéphane Mallarmé as a romantic poet, do you? Rather, I find there to be something distinctly modern in the literary works of the French symbolist poets like Baudelaire, Mallarmé, & Verlaine. Nor do I think it's a coincidence, either, that many modern & contemporary composers have likewise been interested in setting symbolist poetry to music (as well as exotic eastern texts).

Here is what Debussy wrote,

"The music of this prelude is a very free illustration of Mallarmé’s beautiful poem. By no means does it claim to be a synthesis of it. Rather there is a succession of scenes through which pass the desires and dreams of the faun in the heat of the afternoon. Then, tired of pursuing the timorous flight of nymphs and naiads, he succumbs to intoxicating sleep, in which he can finally realize his dreams of possession in universal Nature."

So, to Debussy, the Faun inhabits a world that is somewhere between dreaming and waking, where his ultimate (pantheistic?) quest or desire is a sensual, perhaps erotic "possession in universal Nature", which comes only in sleep & dreams.

Of course, this is a long way from the Romantic poets' relationship to nature, & closer to Freud & Jung ... Especially when you bring into this exotic world of dreaming & waking the idea of eroticism or sensuality, which apparently Nijinsky later took quite literally in his base interpretation of the Faun on stage for the Ballets Russes (that is, by suggesting masterbation).

I had this discussion with a composer friend of mine years ago. He said that he didn't find anything erotic or sexual in the music. & I can understand that. The piece is too beautiful & exotic not to reach towards some higher level of meaning or sublimation, despite Nijinsky's interpretation. But then, what exactly are the Faun's "desires"? if not partly physical? & why didn't Debussy ask Nijinsky to change his interpretation, if it went contrary to his intention?

Yet, even so, today I find myself more inclined to agree with my friend's view of the music than I did in my youth. It all reminds me of a comment that Debussy made to one of his teachers, where he stated, “There is no theory. You merely have to listen. Pleasure is the law.” Of course, I don't think he meant an erotic or sexual pleasure. Rather, he was speaking of something else, a more universal musical "pleasure" that is perhaps best embodied in the Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune. So, perhaps it is sufficient enough to simply describe Debussy’s tone poem as a "sensuous dreamscape", as Timothy Judd writes (in The Listeners’ Club article linked to above.)

All of which I hope helps to explain why Pierre Boulez thought that the Prélude à l’après-midi d’un faune represented the beginning of modernism. Obviously, I agree with Boulez. He wrote,

"The flute of the Faun brought new breath to the art of music; what was overthrown was not so much the art of development, as the very concept of form itself… the reservoir of youth in that score defies depletion and exhaustion."

In other words, for Boulez the Prelude was so vital & renewing that he thought it would continue to be influential, no matter the age. I feel the same way. I've listened to the Prelude hundreds of times over the decades, & it never ceases to amaze or captivate me."

(I then went on to discuss the influence of the 3rd "Sirenes" movement from Debussy's Trois Nocturnes--with its wordless female chorus, on subsequent 20th & 21st century composers, like N. Tcherepnin, Ravel, Pierne, Vaughan Williams, Holst, Ligeti, Saariaho, Hillborg, etc., which I won't include here.)
 
#11 ·
I love listening to it. I didn’t really get it at first but after repeated listens I really love it. I just wish I could truly understand how groundbreaking and insanely amazing and innovative the harmonies in this piece are. But my ears are used to it because we’re listening to it. I’m sure if I understood music theory I would absolutely be floored by the greatness of this piece, now I just really like it
 
#12 ·
The construction of the piece and how it is presented to the listener is enough to send someone to the woodshed for 30 years. How it all works and how everything interweaves is truly miraculous. The harmonic aspect of the work will require another 30 years of woodshedding. ;)
 
#13 · (Edited)
The Faune on it is a 1922 performance from L'orchestre de Concerts Lamoureux directed by Camille Chevillard.


One I like a lot by Mravinski


A lovely lush chamber version from the Boston Symphony Chamber Players


Nurejev's reconstruction of the Nijinsky ballet.


An arrangement for 16 harps by Paul Sarcich

Debussy: Prèlude à l'après-midi d'un faune

Pludermacher/Heisser on two pianos

Debussy - Prélude à l'après-midi d'un faune - Jean-François Heisser & Georges Pludermacher

George Copeland playing his transcription for piano


Ken Russell's film


Is there an interesting modern ballet?