Classical Music Forum banner

Shostakovich's Symphony No. 2

3.5K views 16 replies 14 participants last post by  Tristan  
#1 ·
While I must admit that I have discovered this symphony quite recently, probably because of the sharp decline in popularity that it has experienced when compared to other major symphonic works of the same composer, Shostakovich's symphony no. 2 To October, premiered in 1927, ten years after the October Revolution, is pretty much a new symphony with new colours and composition technique that had not been observed in this composer until then.
The way Shostakovich treats this symphony with an important choral part, is quite innovative. Lacking any cohesive melodic devices, the expressionism and almost "abstract art" used in composing the symphony generated mixed opinions among the critics and audiences. In fact, its atonality surprised many and appealed to some of them.
I was surprised that this symphony is not listed in the "ultimate" 150-symphony list and, well, I just want to know your opinion about it.
 
#8 ·
I received it by mistake and the seller let me keep it and refunded my money, too :) I had it hanging around here for a couple of months and finally put it on last summer. I have to say that I was very pleasantly surprised! The first couple (?) of movements, the instrumental ones, were great. I was not so taken by the final one with the singing. I have since gotten into DSCH's 13th Symphony, a marvellous work that is all songs, so I ought to revisit the 2nd sometime soon.
 
#11 ·
Sure, I can listen to it, but the 'agitprop' section does make the work somewhat disjointed. Remove that and you have a good stand-alone movement which could have provided the foundation for something more substantial - however, the work was commissioned to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Revolution so perhaps DSCH felt obliged to provide something that could be clearly associated with the event. But I'm more than willing to cut DSCH some slack here - he was still finding his feet and writing for chorus was, I think, also new to him. So, all part of the learning curve, then.
 
#12 ·
I've considered DSCH's second and third symphonies quite a lot and have come to see them like the first is more like "study symphonies". He tacked on those revolutionary choral finales just to make them acceptable for the soviet authorities! (Both of the poem's are sub par in the history of Russian poetry and his setting is done much in the sleep!)

It is with Lady Macbeth and the fourth Symphony he reach maturity just to have his ground demolished by the said authorities!

/ptr
 
#16 ·
The new Naxos recording by Petrenko (see pic above in post #13) is very good and well worth picking up.
Also well worthy of hearing is this 2-CD set from Melodiya / BMG Classics with Rozhdestvensky conducting the USSR MoC SO.



If you want to hear the 'October' symphony done by someone who really doesn't get Shostakovich at all, then this disc from BBC Music has curio value. The Shostakovich symphony is one thing, but the performance of Prokofiev's 20th Anniversary Cantata is truly awful.